[OM] Houston camera show and other conversations, NSURIT, 2002/10/01

• Re: [OM] Houston camera show and other conversations, Jim Brokaw, 2002/10/01

[OM] 50 Eyecups on yaBe, Jeff Keller, 2002/10/01

• RE: [OM] 50 Eyecups on yaBe, Jim Caldwell, 2002/10/01

Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, john, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Tom Scales, 2002/10/01
  • Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Tal Lancaster, 2002/10/01
• Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, jamesfc@xxxxxxx, 2002/09/30

[OM] Gunstock info?, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/30

• [OM] Gunstock info?, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/30

[OM] contact print update, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] contact print update, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/30

[OM] 2n Flash, Sean Davis, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] 2n Flash, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] 2n Flash, julian_davies, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] 2n Flash, wiliam Wagenaar, 2002/09/30

[OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Eric, 2002/09/30

• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Jim Caldwell, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Tom Scales, 2002/09/30
  • RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), James N. McBride, 2002/09/30
    • RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Tom Trottier, 2002/10/01
    • RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), James N. McBride, 2002/10/01
• Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), George Sears, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Pschings, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Larry, 2002/10/01
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), William Clark, 2002/09/30
  • RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Tom Trottier, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30
  • RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Tom Trottier, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), William Clark, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Walt Wayman, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Bill Stanke, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), George Sears, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Steve Goss, 2002/10/01
    • Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), Tom Scales, 2002/10/01
• Re: [OM] CHECK THIS OUT :), om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/30

[OM] ( OM ) One prime lens, Brian Swale, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) One prime lens, Dorothée Rapp, 2002/09/30

[OM] Re: ( OM) walkaround camera lens (again), Brian Swale, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] Re: ( OM) walkaround camera lens (again), Andre Goforth, 2002/09/30

[OM] Photokina disappointment, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/30

• RE: [OM] Photokina disappointment, William Clark, 2002/09/30
• Re:[OM] Photokina disappointment, plp, 2002/09/30

[OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, VS, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Bolty, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Julian Davies, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, ll . clark, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Chris Barker, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Gary Edwards, 2002/10/01
• RE: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/30
  • Re: RE: [OM] Finally got some of my Tuscany photos uploaded, siddiq, 2002/09/30

[OM] OT - Buried treasures, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] OT - Buried treasures, siddiq, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] OT - Buried treasures, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30

[OM] Road Trip!!, Albert, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] Road Trip!!, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Road Trip!!, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/30

[OM] Rare lens sighting, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/30

• Re: [OM] Rare lens sighting, John Duggan, 2002/09/30

[OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, Julian Davies, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, Julian Davies, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, John A. Lind, 2002/10/01
  • [OM] [OT] Trying the whole Graflex thing again, M. Lloyd, 2002/10/01
• Re: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, julian_davies, 2002/09/30
• Fw: [OM] shift lenses; plastic lenses; bellows factor, C.H.Ling, 2002/10/01

[OM] Wanted: Varimagni Finder Instructions, Doggre, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Wanted: Varimagni Finder Instructions, George Sears, 2002/09/29
• [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Frank van Lindert - KNMI, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] Wanted: E-20 software, Tom Scales, 2002/09/30
  • [OM] Was: E-20 software, how long do the batteries last on this camera?, Eric, 2002/09/30
• [OM] Wanted: Varimagni Finder Instructions, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/29

Re: [OM] Discarding old models, was Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5 (long), Walt Wayman, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Discarding old models, was Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5 (not as long), John A. Lind, 2002/09/29

[OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, plp, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, plp, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] Kiron 28/2 at KEH, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/30

[OM] Oddities of another system, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Oddities of another system, W.Xato, 2002/09/30

[OM] Lens and Film Testing, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Lens and Film Testing, Garth Wood, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] Lens and Film Testing, John A. Lind, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] Lens and Film Testing, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/30

[OM] How we deal with the small problems, Doggre, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Tom Scales, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] How we deal with the small problems, clintonr, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30
• [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/30
• [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Doggre, 2002/09/30
• RE: [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] How we deal with the small problems, Jamie Costello, 2002/10/01

[OM] plastic beater lens, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] plastic beater lens, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] plastic beater lens, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/30

[OM] Cbc, cbf, jlind, 2002/09/29

• Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, John A. Lind, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, Garth Wood, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, John A. Lind, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, Barry B. Bean, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, Eric, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] Cbc, cbf, ll . clark, 2002/09/30

[OM] "bellows factor" redux, Mike, 2002/09/28

• Re: [OM] "bellows factor" redux, John A. Lind, 2002/09/29

[OM] Need help with Olympus Pen ID, George Sears, 2002/09/28

• Re: [OM] Need help with Olympus Pen ID, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] Need help with Olympus Pen ID, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] Need help with Olympus Pen ID, George Sears, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] Need help with Olympus Pen ID, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/29

[OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Brian Swale, 2002/09/28

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, dreammoose, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Larry, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] ( OM ) OM service on the Bay, Volkhart Baumgaertner, 2002/09/30

Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, NSURIT, 2002/09/28

• Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, mms, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, The Butler Family, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/30
  • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, Mike Butler, 2002/09/30

[OM] OM topics: We have talked about everything, so . . ., NSURIT, 2002/09/28

• [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, John Robison, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, John A. Lind, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, ll . clark, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, William Latham, 2002/09/30
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, siddiq, 2002/09/30
    • Message not available
    • Re: [OM] madness! thinking of ditching an OM for a c@non?, John A. Lind, 2002/09/30
• Re: [OM] OM topics: We have talked about everything, so . . ., Richard F. Man, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] OM topics: We have talked about everything, so . . ., NSURIT, 2002/09/28

[OM] sticky OMPC, Mike, 2002/09/28

• Re: [OM] sticky OMPC, Ian BManners, 2002/09/28

[OM] Loose Pen F focusing screen, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/27

• RE: [OM] Loose Pen F focusing screen, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Loose Pen F focusing screen, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/28

[OM] analog and digital, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/27

• Re: [OM] analog and digital, Albert, 2002/09/28
• [OM] analog and digital, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] analog and digital, Ian BManners, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] analog and digital, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] analog and digital, OM4Ti, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] analog and digital, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] analog and digital, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] analog and digital, Benson Honig, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] analog and digital, George Sears, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] analog and digital, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/28

[OM] [OT] The future of film, Grigorov, Boris, 2002/09/27

• [OM] How we deal with the small problems..., Johan Malmström, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] How we deal with the small problems..., Albert, 2002/09/28

[OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Albert, 2002/09/27

• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, iwert, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, John Wheeler, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, john, 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, George Sears, 2002/09/27
  • RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Simon Gotlieb, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Albert, 2002/09/27
    • RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/27
    • RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Sam Shiell, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Albert, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, John Duggan, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, dreammoose, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Albert, 2002/09/29
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Eric, 2002/09/27
• [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Robert Judy, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/27
  • RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, suchismit, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Tom Wagner, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Brian Swale, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Tom Scales, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Tom Scales, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Tom Scales, 2002/09/28
    • [OM] Ouotable Quote, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ouotable Quote, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Ouotable Quote, derek fong, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/28
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/29
• RE: [OM] Ultimate Travel Camera, Brian Swale, 2002/09/29

Re: [OM] ( OM ) 18mm What ever happened to..., om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/26

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) 18mm What ever happened to..., Chuck Norcutt, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] ( OM ) 18mm What ever happened to..., Andre Goforth, 2002/09/27

RE: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/26

• [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, MacDonald, David (DPM), 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Chris Barker, 2002/09/27
• RE: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, MacDonald, David (DPM), 2002/09/27
  • RE: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/27
  • RE: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Chris Barker, 2002/09/28
    • Re: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, clintonr, 2002/09/28
    • [OM] Discarding old models, was Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Chris Barker, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] Discarding old models, was Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5 (long), John A. Lind, 2002/09/29
    • Re: [OM] Discarding old models, was Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5(long), clintonr, 2002/09/30

[OM] Meeting Maitani, suchismit, 2002/09/26

• Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, suchismit, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Apple Computers, Albert, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Apple Computers, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] Meeting Maitani, Larry, 2002/09/27
• [OM] Meeting Maitani, HI100, 2002/09/28

Re: [OM] What's in a name?, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/26

• Re: [OM] What's in a name?, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/27

RE: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olyda k?, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/26

• Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses onOlyda k?, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses onOlyda k?, George Sears, 2002/09/26

[OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/26

• Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] Olydak prototype; Use OM lenses as shift lenses on Olydak?, suchismit, 2002/09/26

[OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, NSURIT, 2002/09/26

• RE: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, NSURIT, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Mike, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/26
• [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Brian Swale, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, NSURIT, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] FS: Houston Camera Show & Swap Meet This Week-end, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/27

RE: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/26

• RE: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, julian_davies, 2002/09/26

[OM] ( OM ) Tamron 300/2.8 SP, Brian Swale, 2002/09/26

• [OM] ( OM ) Tamron 300/2.8 SP, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/26

[OM] ( OM ) 135mm macro shots, Brian Swale, 2002/09/26

• [OM] OT - NPR Science Friday, Jamie Costello, 2002/09/27
  • Re: [OM] OT - NPR Science Friday, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/27

[OM] ( OM ) 18mm, Brian Swale, 2002/09/25

• [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26
    • RE: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, John Hermanson, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26
    • RE: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26
    • RE: [OM] Firing 2 flash guns, James N. McBride, 2002/09/26
    • [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, clintonr, 2002/09/26
    • RE: [OM] Repairing a 35/70 3.5~4.5, James N. McBride, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) 18mm What ever happened to..., Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26

Re: [OM] Digital -- who needs it?, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] Digital -- who needs it?, George Sears, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Digital -- who needs it?, iwert, 2002/09/27

[OM] Olympus to merge?, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] Olympus to merge?, Tom, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] Olympus to merge?, John Hermanson, 2002/09/26

[OM] [OM Digital] Universal Lens mount, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/25

• Re:[OM] [OM Digital] Universal Lens mount, plp, 2002/09/26

[OM] Answers about the Olydak...., William Clark, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Tom Scales, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., C.H.Ling, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., John Hermanson, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Tom, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., C.H.Ling, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Tom, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., William Clark, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., C.H.Ling, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Jay Maynard, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., William Clark, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., William Clark, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/25
• [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Mike Veglia, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak.... Press Release, too, Tom, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., suchismit, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] Answers about the Olydak...., Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/30

Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known"), Rick, 2002/09/25

• Ree: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known"), Larry, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known"), Larry, 2002/09/26

[OM] PayPal Scam ALERT!!, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25

• [OM] Zuikos and the Four-Thirds, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] PayPal Scam ALERT!!, Ian BManners, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] PayPal Scam ALERT!!, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] PayPal Scam ALERT!!, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] PayPal Scam ALERT!!, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/26

[OM] Carl Zeiss Jena 28-85/4-5 zoom, Ben Russell, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] Carl Zeiss Jena 28-85/4-5 zoom, Benson Russell, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] Carl Zeiss Jena 28-85/4-5 zoom, Stuart Landrum, 2002/09/28
  • Re: [OM] Carl Zeiss Jena 28-85/4-5 zoom, dreammoose, 2002/09/28
• Re: [OM] Carl Zeiss Jena 28-85/4-5 zoom, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/28

[OM] Tokina zoom question, Ralf Loi, 2002/09/25

• RE: [OM] Tokina zoom question, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Tokina zoom question, Angel Lobo, 2002/09/25

RE: [OM] (OT) of this and that, Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/25

• RE: [OM] (OT) of this and that, John Wheeler, 2002/09/25

[OM] more macro questions, Mike, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] more macro questions, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] more macro questions, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] more: more macro questions, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] more macro questions, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25
  • RE: [OM] more macro questions, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] more macro questions, Mike, 2002/09/25
  • RE: [OM] more macro questions, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] more macro questions, Mike, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] more macro questions, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25
  • RE: [OM] more macro questions, Tom, 2002/09/26
  • RE: [OM] more macro questions, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26

[OM] New OM Photos to share, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/25

• Re: [OM] New OM Photos to share, Tom Scales, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] New OM Photos to share, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
• [OM] New OM Photos to share, Brian Swale, 2002/09/25

[OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/25

• RE: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Tom Scales, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Brian Swale, 2002/09/25
• Re: RE: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/26

[OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", John Robison, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Tom Scales, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Steve Goss, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Mike Veglia, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Andre Goforth, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Tom Scales, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Mike Veglia, 2002/09/26
  • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Albert, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Garth Wood, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Albert, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Tom Wagner, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", C.H.Ling, 2002/09/27
    • Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/27
• Re: Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/27
• Re: [OM] "I am so, like, totally, not impressed.", AG Schnozz, 2002/09/27

[OM] ( OM) Digital data, Brian Swale, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] ( OM) Digital data, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] ( OM) Digital data, William Clark, 2002/09/25

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Thomas A Simmons, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Norman S. Nadel, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Michael, 2002/09/25
    • [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/25
  • [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/25
    • RE: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, James N. McBride, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Benson Russell, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] [OT] regarding certain prosthetics, Norman S. Nadel, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, DaEyeGuy, 2002/09/25
• Re: Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/25
• RE: Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/25

[OM] Olympus missed twice, suchismit, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] Olympus missed twice, Larry, 2002/09/25

[OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Rick, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Dan Lau, 2002/09/24
• [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Walt Wayman, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Rick, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] 35-80 2.8 (was " I may have fanged and not known", Larry, 2002/09/25

[OM] Four Thirds System, omboy, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, John Robison, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Four Thirds System, William Clark, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Aaron Ginn, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Four Thirds System, William Clark, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Four Thirds System, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Jay Maynard, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Jay Maynard, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Chris Barker, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Four Thirds System, William Clark, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Four Thirds System, William Clark, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, suchismit, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Four Thirds System, plp, 2002/09/24

[OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Brian Swale, 2002/09/24

• RE: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, John A. Lind, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Garth Wood, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, NSURIT, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) of this and that, Brian Swale, 2002/09/25

Re: [OM] 35 shi(f)t, 35/2, 200/4 cheap, julian_davies, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] 35 shi(f)t, 35/2, 200/4 cheap, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/24

[OM] Some questions about macro shooting, The Bobbs, 2002/09/24

• Re: [OM] Some questions about macro shooting, dreammoose, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Some questions about macro shooting, bsandyman, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Some questions about macro shooting, William Clark, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Some questions about macro shooting, The Bobbs, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Some questions about macro shooting, M. Lloyd, 2002/09/25

Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/23

• RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/29
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, ll . clark, 2002/09/29

[OM] One expensive 50/3.5, Dan Lau, 2002/09/23

• Re: [OM] One expensive 50/3.5, Steve Goss, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] One expensive 50/3.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/24
• [OM] One expensive 50/3.5, Doggre, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] One expensive 50/3.5, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/24

[OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth?, Woody K., 2002/09/23

• Re: [OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth?, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth?, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth?, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth? (3Ti for sale), Woody K., 2002/09/29
• Re: [OM] What's the OM-3Ti worth?, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/24

[OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, suchismit, 2002/09/23

• Re: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, William Clark, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, suchismit, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/23
  • [OM] OT New "word", was reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8, Chris Barker, 2002/09/23

[OM] Interesting reading, rk1, 2002/09/23

• Re: [OM] Interesting reading, Tom Scales, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Interesting reading, John Robison, 2002/09/23

[OM] manual ext tubes, Ben Russell, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] manual ext tubes, Tom Scales, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] manual ext tubes, dreammoose, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] manual ext tubes, Benson Russell, 2002/09/23

[OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, Benson Russell, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, Benson Russell, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, Lars Haven, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, clintonr, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, julian_davies, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, clintonr, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, Benson Russell, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, John Hermanson, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, Benson Russell, 2002/09/26
    • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, clintonr, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, julian_davies, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, clintonr, 2002/09/26
• Re: [OM] 50/3.5 with a clunk, julian_davies, 2002/09/27

Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/22

• Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Tom Scales, 2002/09/22
• Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/23
  • Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
• RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/23
  • RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/23
  • RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/23
    • Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, dreammoose, 2002/09/24
    • Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26
    • RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, James N. McBride, 2002/09/26
    • RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/27
• RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/23
• Re: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/26
• RE: Re [OM] I may have fanged and not known, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/27

[OM] Re: Doin the Airbag Bash, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] Re: Doin the Airbag Bash, Larry, 2002/09/23

[OM] BW films again, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] BW films again, John A. Lind, 2002/09/22
• Re: [OM] BW films again - from Gary R, w shumaker, 2002/09/25
• Re: [OM] BW films again, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/23

[OM] Re: scam off OM topic, Benson Honig, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] Re: scam off OM topic, Tom, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] Re: scam off OM topic (OT), Roger Wesson, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] Re: scam off OM topic (OT), Benson Russell, 2002/09/24

[OM] Just the FAQ's, m'am, Steve Goss, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] Just the FAQ's, m'am, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Just the FAQ's, m'am, Harry Wiechel, 2002/09/23

[OM] What condition does it need to be in to be a fang?, Steve Goss, 2002/09/22

• Re: [OM] What condition does it need to be in to be a fang?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/22
• Re: [OM] What condition does it need to be in to be a fang?, Julian Davies, 2002/09/22
  • Re: [OM] What condition does it need to be in to be a fang?, siddiq, 2002/09/22
    • Re: [OM] What condition does it need to be in to be a fang?, Julian Davies, 2002/09/22

[OM] XA A11 settings, Robert Judy, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] XA A11 settings, Paul D. Farrar, 2002/09/22
• Re: [OM] XA A11 settings, Chris Barker, 2002/09/22
• [OM] XA A11 settings, gries, 2002/09/23

[OM] Grain aliasing, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] Grain aliasing, dreammoose, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] Grain aliasing, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/27

[OM] Beattie screens?, Albert, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, John Hermanson, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, dreammoose, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, Tom, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, Bachofen, 2002/09/22
  • Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/22
  • Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, John Hermanson, 2002/09/23
• Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, NSURIT, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Beattie screens?, John Hermanson, 2002/09/23

[OM] zuiko 35-70F3.6 & 58mm filters & vignetting, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] zuiko 35-70F3.6 & 58mm filters & vignetting, dreammoose, 2002/09/21

[OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, Albert, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, christian, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, dreammoose, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] What lenses would you guys recommend?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/21

[OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Albert, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Albert, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Tom, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] Silicon Film, I think you guys might be wrong, Dan Lau, 2002/09/21

[OM] (OT) Source for simichrome?, Doggre, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] (OT) Source for simichrome?, Larry, 2002/09/21

[OM] earthquake, Mike, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] earthquake, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/21
• RE: [OM] earthquake, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/21

[OM] Digital photography article, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Andrew Beals, 2002/09/21
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, William Clark, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, William Clark, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/23
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, tOM Trottier, 2002/09/23
    • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Chris Barker, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, iwert, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Tom Scales, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, John Hermanson, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Chris Barker, 2002/09/25
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, tOM Trottier, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, William Clark, 2002/09/23
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Albert, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, derek fong, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Andrew Beals, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, derek fong, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, William Clark, 2002/09/23
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Steve Goss, 2002/09/24
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Andrew Beals, 2002/09/24
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Chris Barker, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Digital photography article, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Thomas A Simmons, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/24
• Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/24
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Andrew Beals, 2002/09/25
  • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/25
    • Re: [OM] Digital photography article, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/25
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/25
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/26
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, John A. Lind, 2002/09/26
    • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26
  • RE: [OM] Digital photography article, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/26
• RE: [OM] Digital photography article, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/26

[OM] I hope I caught this missile launch on the XA, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] I hope I caught this missile launch on the XA, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] I hope I caught this missile launch on the XA, siddiq, 2002/09/22

[OM] Camera Case/Brief Case, James N. McBride, 2002/09/21

• Re: [OM] Camera Case/Brief Case, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Camera Case/Brief Case, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] Camera Case/Brief Case, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/21

[OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Rick, 2002/09/20

• [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Silicon film concept (long), Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/22
    • Re: [OM] Silicon film concept (long), Aaron Ginn, 2002/09/22
    • Re: [OM] Silicon film concept (long), Tom, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Albert, 2002/09/22
• [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Chuck Norcutt, 2002/09/22
  • Re: [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, dreammoose, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Tom, 2002/09/23
  • Re: [OM] Silicon film-email them!!, Albert, 2002/09/23

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3611, David McGriffy, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3611, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/21

[OM] [OT] Source for simichrome?, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] [OT] Source for simichrome?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/20
• [OM] [OT] Source for simichrome?, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Source for simichrome?, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/21
• [OM] [OT] Source for simichrome?, Jeff Keller, 2002/09/20

Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Wright, Steve (Darlington), 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, w shumaker, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Tom, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Tom, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Dan Lau, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Steve Goss, 2002/09/21
  • Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Joshua Putnam, 2002/09/21
• Re: Re: [OM] Silicon Film Strikes Again, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/21

[OM] That digital back is back!!!!!, William Clark, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] That digital back is back!!!!!, Andrew Beals, 2002/09/20
• RE: [OM] That digital back is back!!!!!, William Clark, 2002/09/20
• RE: [OM] That digital back is back!!!!!, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/20

[OM] [FS] Extra Zuiko's (+ 28-48/4, Pen FV, RC), om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/20

• RE: [OM] [FS] Extra Zuiko's (+ 28-48/4, Pen FV, RC), om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] [FS] Extra Zuiko's (+ 28-48/4, Pen FV, RC), Tom Scales, 2002/09/20

[OM] Re: new flash product?, Benson Honig, 2002/09/20

• RE: [OM] Re: new flash product?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Re: new flash product?, Steve Goss, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] Re: new flash product?, Benson Honig, 2002/09/21
  • [OM] SPAM/SCAM Warning., Ian BManners, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] SPAM/SCAM Warning., Garth Wood, 2002/09/21
• Re: Re: [OM] Re: new flash product?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/21

[OM] FS on 'Bay thing: VisionAge Magazine #4 1985, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] FS on 'Bay thing: VisionAge Magazine #4 1985, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] FS on 'Bay thing: VisionAge Magazine #4 1985, VS, 2002/09/20

[OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes - 2nd & hopefully last, ReinholdLetschert, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes - 2nd & hopefully last, Tom, 2002/09/20

[OM] Info on Vivitar 135/f2.8, John Wheeler, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] Info on Vivitar 135/f2.8, Tom Wagner, 2002/09/20
  • RE: [OM] Info on Vivitar 135/f2.8, John Wheeler, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Info on Vivitar 135/f2.8, Charles Sdunek, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Info on Vivitar 135/f2.8, JMeyers102, 2002/09/20

RE: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/20

• RE: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, Albert, 2002/09/22
  • Re: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, siddiq, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/20

Re: [OM] OM bodies vs. Contax Aria (was: OM-4Ti), Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/20

• Re: [OM] OM bodies vs. Contax Aria (was: OM-4Ti), Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/20

[OM] Has the vapor condensed?, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/19

• Re: [OM] Has the vapor condensed?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/20
  • Re: [OM] Has the vapor condensed?, Albert, 2002/09/20
• Re: [OM] Has the vapor condensed?, Dan Lau, 2002/09/20

[OM] What's a "lightbrush"?, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/19

• Re: [OM] What's a "lightbrush"?, Steve Goss, 2002/09/20
  • RE: [OM] What's a "lightbrush"?, James N. McBride, 2002/09/20

RE: [OM] Some very interesting stats....../Digital transition, William Clark, 2002/09/19

• RE: [OM] Some very interesting stats....../Digital transition, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/19

[OM] Re: [OT] ....handholding is strictly for dead photographers, plp, 2002/09/19

• [OM] Olympus Trip 35., Gareth Martin, 2002/09/24
  • Re: [OM] Olympus Trip 35., clintonr, 2002/09/24
• [OM] Re: [OT] ....handholding is strictly for dead photographers, Garry D. Lewis, 2002/09/20

[OM] Bargain OMPC system with Halliburton case, tOM Trottier, 2002/09/19

• Re: [OM] Bargain OMPC system with Halliburton case, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/19
  • Re: [OM] Bargain OMPC system with Halliburton case, Ed Senior, 2002/09/19

[OM] FS, Workman, Mark, 2002/09/19

• Re: [OM] FS, JMeyers102, 2002/09/19
  • Re: [OM] FS, Tom Scales, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] FS, JMeyers102, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] FS, JMeyers102, 2002/09/19

[OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, ReinholdLetschert, 2002/09/19

• Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Michael, 2002/09/19
  • Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/19
• [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/19
  • Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/19
    • Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, dreammoose, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, julian_davies, 2002/09/19
• [OM] re: lens hoods/suitablity/shapes, Jeff Keller, 2002/09/20

[OM] New work on site - all OM! ;), Robert Gries, 2002/09/18

• Re: [OM] New work on site - all OM! ;), John A. Lind, 2002/09/22

[OM] Some very interesting stats......, William Clark, 2002/09/18

• Re: [OM] Some very interesting stats......, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/18
• RE: [OM] Some very interesting stats......, William Clark, 2002/09/19
  • RE: [OM] Some very interesting stats....../Digital transition, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/19

RE: [OM] 36 bit colour in Photoshop?, was How to Capture subtle colors, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/18

• RE: [OM] 36 bit colour in Photoshop?, was How to Capture subtle colors, Chris Barker, 2002/09/18

[OM] "A real camera", Larry Woods, 2002/09/18

• Re: [OM] "A real camera", Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] "A real camera", Charles Sdunek, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] "A real camera", Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] "A real camera", Charles Sdunek, 2002/09/18

[OM] flash questions, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/17

• RE: [OM] flash questions, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/18
• [OM] flash questions, gries, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] flash questions, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] flash questions, julian_davies, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] flash questions, julian_davies, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] flash questions, Tom Scales, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] flash questions, dreammoose, 2002/09/18

[OM] query regarding list etiquette, Workman, Mark, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, siddiq, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Tom Scales, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Garth Wood, 2002/09/17
  • RE: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, James N. McBride, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/18
    • RE: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, James N. McBride, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] query regarding list etiquette, Pschings, 2002/09/17

[OM] Guatemala ... and calibrating OM-40, Bernard Frangoulis, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Guatemala ... and calibrating OM-40, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/17
  • RE: [OM] Guatemala ... and calibrating OM-40, James N. McBride, 2002/09/17

[OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, NSURIT, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, dreammoose, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, clintonr, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, dreammoose, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] Spanner wrenches from Micro-tools, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/17

[OM] Cameta (was Varimagni Cheap), Doggre, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Cameta (was Varimagni Cheap), John Hermanson, 2002/09/17

[OM] OT CD's and green markers (was: OM-4Ti), Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] OT CD's and green markers (was: OM-4Ti), John Hermanson, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OT CD's and green markers (was: OM-4Ti), Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/17

[OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Bill Pearce, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Tom, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Tom Scales, 2002/09/18
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Jim Caldwell, 2002/09/18
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Jim Caldwell, 2002/09/18
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/18
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Jim Caldwell, 2002/09/19
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Terry and Tracey, 2002/09/20
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Ian BManners, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Tom Scales, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Roger Wesson, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Ian BManners, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Bill Stanke, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Ian BManners, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., Larry, 2002/09/19
    • RE: [OM] Shhhhhhhhh..., John Wheeler, 2002/09/19
    • [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, John A. Lind, 2002/09/22
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/22
    • RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, James N. McBride, 2002/09/22
    • RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Tom, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Jay Maynard, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, siddiq, 2002/09/23
    • RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Jon Mitchell, 2002/09/23
    • Re: RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, siddiq, 2002/09/23
    • RE: RE: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Jon Mitchell, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, John A. Lind, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, siddiq, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Larry, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, dreammoose, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] airbag systems check, siddiq, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, siddiq, 2002/09/22
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Tom, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Larry, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, dreammoose, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Chris Barker, 2002/09/23
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Doin' the Airbag Bash, Barry B. Bean, 2002/09/25

[OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, siddiq, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/17
    • [OM] OT - Cheap flights in Europe, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Chris Barker, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/19
• Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, siddiq, 2002/09/18

[OM] Belgium payments, tOM Trottier, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] Belgium payments, Garth Wood, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Belgium payments, iwert, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Belgium payments, svandenzegel , 2002/09/17

[OM] ( OM ) re: lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Brian Swale, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) re: lens discussion - N*k*n etc, dreammoose, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) re: lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Brian Swale, 2002/09/18
  • Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/18
    • Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/18
    • Re: Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/18
    • Re: Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/18
    • Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] ( OM ) re: lens discussion - N*k*n etc, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/18

[OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/17

• Re: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, siddiq, 2002/09/17
• RE: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/17
  • RE: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
    • Re: RE: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, siddiq, 2002/09/17
    • Re: RE: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Pschings, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/17
• RE: [OM] The death of film.. pt n+1, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/17
  • RE: [OM] slow film was The death of film.. pt n+1, siddiq, 2002/09/17

RE: [OM] B&W filters, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] B&W filters, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] B&W filters, ll . clark, 2002/09/17

[OM] RE: Varimagni cheap [OT] : tOM Trottier, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] RE: Varimagni cheap [OT] : tOM Trottier, Tom, 2002/09/16

[OM] hoods, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] hoods, Tom, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] hoods, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] hoods, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] hoods, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] hoods, Tom Trottier, 2002/09/17
• [OM] hoods, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] hoods, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] hoods, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/17

[OM] Varimagni cheap, tOM Trottier, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, Tom Scales, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, John Hermanson, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, clintonr, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, Larry, 2002/09/16
• Re: Re: [OM] Varimagni cheap, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/17

[OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, NSURIT, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Roger D. Key, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Tom, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Paul Laughlin, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, NSURIT, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, julian_davies, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Roger D. Key, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, julian_davies, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, gwsears, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, Roger D. Key, 2002/09/19
  • Re: [OM] Info/WTB Lens hood for the 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, dreammoose, 2002/09/19

[OM] Re: (Was OM4t) N*k*n 80-200 on a friend's kids, Brian Swale, 2002/09/16

• [OM] Re: (Was OM4t) N*k*n 80-200 on a friend's kids, Brian Swale, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Re: (Was OM4t) N*k*n 80-200 on a friend's kids, suchismit, 2002/09/16

[OM] Heads up - Lens hood for 28-48mm Zuiko, NSURIT, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] Heads up - Lens hood for 28-48mm Zuiko, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/16

[OM] spot-metering body, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] spot-metering body, Albert, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, Tom Scales, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
• Re: Re: [OM] spot-metering body, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, Albert, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] spot-metering body, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] spot-metering body, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/17

[OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Albert, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Andrew Dacey, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, siddiq, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Ed Senior, 2002/09/16
    • MooVue film (was Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions), Ed Senior, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Albert, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Chris Barker, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, bill biesele, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Albert, 2002/09/16
• [OM] B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Doggre, 2002/09/17
  • [OM] Re: B&W 400 film, need suggestions, Olympus List, 2002/09/18

[OM] Re: ( OM ) was megapixel madness, Brian Swale, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) was megapixel madness, dreammoose, 2002/09/16

[OM] TTL Flash on manual?, mms, 2002/09/16

• Re: [OM] TTL Flash on manual?, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/16

[OM] Merlins & Griffons Update, Doggre, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Merlins & Griffons Update, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/16

[OM] Om4Ti in UK £395 MXV Photographic (Sussex) Ltd, John and Julie Ockman, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Om4Ti in UK £395 MXV Photographic (Sussex) Ltd, Lars Haven, 2002/09/15
  • [OM] Re: [OM] Om4Ti in UK £395 MXV Photographic (Sussex) Ltd, Eric, 2002/09/16

[OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), plp, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digitalphotography), Tom Scales, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digitalphotography), Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digitalphotography), Tom Scales, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digitalphotography), Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), VS, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), clintonr, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] "foiled" again (was: Professionals and digital photography), clintonr, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] Clint is foiled again (was: Professionals and digital photography), AG Schnozz, 2002/09/16

[OM] you can see this coming..., Bill Pearce, 2002/09/15

• [OM] Lightmeter recommendations, Scott and Barb, 2002/09/15
• [OM] Light meters, Chris Barker, 2002/09/15

[OM] 65-200 Fungus / oil, Julian Davies, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] 65-200 Fungus / oil, Bob, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] 65-200 Fungus / oil, Roger D. Key, 2002/09/15

[OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Albert, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Albert, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Joshua Putnam, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Albert, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Joshua Putnam, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Albert, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
  • [OM] Masters of American Photography, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
• [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Brian Swale, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, John A. Lind, 2002/09/17
• Re: Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, dreammoose, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] Lightmeter cumbersome?, Tom, 2002/09/18

[OM] OM-4Ti, Albert, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, iwert, 2002/09/15
• RE: [OM] OM-4Ti, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti(65-200 zoom), Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti(65-200 zoom), C.H.Ling, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Chris Barker, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/16
• RE: [OM] OM-4Ti, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Albert, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, John Hermanson, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, John Hermanson, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Mike, 2002/09/16
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, suchismit, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/16
• Re: Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/17
• RE: [OM] OM-4Ti, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/17
• RE: [OM] OM-4Ti, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/17
  • RE: [OM] OM-4Ti, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, Rand E. Tomcala, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] OM-4Ti, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2002/09/18

[OM] Wedding day redux, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Wedding day redux, John A. Lind, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] Wedding day redux, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Wedding day redux, John A. Lind, 2002/09/22

Re: [OM] Goods on evilbay, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Goods on evilbay, Ian BManners, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] Goods on evilbay, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/15

Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Chuck Norcutt, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Brian Swale, 2002/09/16

[OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Jay Maynard, 2002/09/15

• Re: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Dave Dougherty, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Wayne Culberson, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] Professionals and digital photography (long), clintonr, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Professionals and digital photography (long), Julian Davies, 2002/09/15
• RE: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/15
  • RE: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
  • RE: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, ll . clark, 2002/09/15
  • RE: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Karen Fenstermacher, 2002/09/18
• RE: [OM] Professionals and digital photography on Slashdot, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/15

[OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness, Brian Swale, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Re: ( OM ) Was megapixel madness, Paul D. Farrar, 2002/09/16

[OM] more on film, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] more on film, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] more on film, ll . clark, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] more on film, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] more on film, ll . clark, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] more on film, John A. Lind, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] more on film, ll . clark, 2002/09/17

[OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, Joe Gwinn, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, Matt Crawley, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, dreammoose, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] Scanning B&W photos and the Callier Effect, w shumaker, 2002/09/16

[OM] The perfect chrome film, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, John A. Lind, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Terry and Tracey, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Ralf Loi, 2002/09/16
  • AW: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Jochen Schiffler, 2002/09/16
    • [OM] Velvia ISO setting?, was The perfect chrome film, Chris Barker, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Damon Wood, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] The perfect chrome film, Sean Mooney, 2002/09/18

[OM] speculations on the Olympus digital SLR, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/14

• RE: [OM] speculations on the Olympus digital SLR, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/14
• [OM] List edicate, was speculations on the Olympus digital SLR, Ian BManners, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] speculations on the Olympus digital SLR, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/14

[OM] FS: B300 New In Box, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] FS: B300 New In Box, Brian Swale, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] FS: B300 New In Box, M. Lloyd, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] FS: B300 New In Box, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/15

[OM] Film advice, Tom Wagner, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] Film advice, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Film advice, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Film advice, Matt Crawley, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Film advice, John A. Lind, 2002/09/14
    • RE: [OM] Film advice, Buddy Walters, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Film advice, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Film advice, siddiq, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Film advice, John A. Lind, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Film advice, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/21
• Re: [OM] Film advice, Motor Sport Visions Photography, 2002/09/14
• [OM] Film Advice, Doggre, 2002/09/14
  • AW: [OM] Film Advice, Jochen Schiffler, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Film Advice, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Film Advice, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Film Advice, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Film advice, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Film advice, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/15

RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/14

• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Matt Crawley, 2002/09/14
• RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Mike, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/14
• [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Mike, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, W. J. Liles, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Thomas A Simmons, 2002/09/16
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/17
    • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, W. J. Liles, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/18
    • [OM] OT 727s and shockwaves, was OT Low Flying ..., Chris Barker, 2002/09/18
• RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Marc Lawrence, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/17
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Thomas A Simmons, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/18
  • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/18
    • Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Terry and Tracey, 2002/09/20
    • RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/20
• RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/18
• Re: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, Mike Veglia, 2002/09/18
• RE: [OM] OT Low Flying, was an OM weekend, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/19

[OM] I Touched Merlins and Griffons Today!, Doggre, 2002/09/13

• RE: [OM] I Touched Merlins and Griffons Today!, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13
• [OM] I Touched Merlins and Griffons Today!, Doggre, 2002/09/14
  • RE: [OM] I Touched Merlins and Griffons Today!, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] I Touched Merlins and Griffons Today!, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/14

[OM] Olympus digital SLR, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] Olympus digital SLR, Albert, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] Olympus digital SLR, Tom Scales, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] Olympus digital SLR, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] Olympus digital SLR, Mickey Trageser, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Olympus digital SLR, Tom Scales, 2002/09/14

Re: [OM] html content in postings, Mike, 2002/09/13

• RE: [OM] html content in postings, James N. McBride, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] html content in postings, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] html content in postings, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
    • [OM] B&W filters, w shumaker, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] B&W filters, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/16
    • Re: [OM] B&W filters, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/17
• Re: [OM] html content in postings, Mike, 2002/09/14

RE: [OM] part 3, And this is a vacation?, Mike, 2002/09/13

• RE: [OM] part 3, And this is a vacation?, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] part 3, And this is a vacation?, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/13

Re: [OM] [OT] MicroDrives, was Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, plp, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] [OT] MicroDrives, was Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] [OT] MicroDrives, was Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/14

[OM] OT, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] OT, Tom Scales, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] OT, Paul Farrar, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] OT, Ed Senior, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] OT, Gary Richardson, 2002/09/13
    • [OM] filters, Gary Richardson, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] OT, John A. Lind, 2002/09/13
• [OM] OT, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/23
  • RE: [OM] OT, Jon Mitchell, 2002/09/23
    • RE: [OM] OT, James N. McBride, 2002/09/23
• RE: [OM] OT, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/23
  • RE: [OM] OT, Ian G Skelly, 2002/09/23

[OM] ( OM ) ever so slightly, Brian Swale, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) ever so slightly, siddiq, 2002/09/13
• [OM] Digest/Apple Problem?[OT], Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• [OM] Pop Photo, was ever so slightly, Jim L'Hommedieu, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Pop Photo, was ever so slightly, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) ever so slightly, Brian Swale, 2002/09/14

[OM] Life style change coming up, Chuck Norcutt, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, w shumaker, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Johnny Johnson, 2002/09/13
    • RE: [OM] Life style change coming up, James N. McBride, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, John A. Lind, 2002/09/14
• [OM] Life style change coming up, Robert Gries, 2002/09/13
  • RE: [OM] Life style change coming up, James N. McBride, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Eric, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] Life style change coming up, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Eric, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/14
• Re: [OM] Life style change coming up, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/15

[OM] (OT) I Touched Merlins & Griffons today!, Doggre, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] (OT) I Touched Merlins & Griffons today!, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] (OT) I Touched Merlins & Griffons today!, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13

[OM] Good News!, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/13

• Re: [OM] Good News!, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Good News!, Jim L'Hommedieu, 2002/09/14
  • Re: [OM] Good News!, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/14
    • [OM] Goods on evilbay, Ian BManners, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Goods on evilbay, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] Good News!, Tom Scales, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] Good News!, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/15
    • Re: [OM] Good News!, Jim L'Hommedieu, 2002/09/17

RE: [OM] Palm Pilots and records of shots taken, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/13

• RE: [OM] Palm Pilots and records of shots taken, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
  • Re: RE: [OM] Palm Pilots and records of shots taken, siddiq, 2002/09/13
• RE: RE: [OM] Palm Pilots and records of shots taken, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/14

[OM] on digital, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] on digital, Larry, 2002/09/13

[OM] ( OM ) html content in postings, Brian Swale, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) html content in postings, Ian BManners, 2002/09/13

[OM] megapixel madness?, William Sommerwerck, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, w shumaker, 2002/09/12
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, plp, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, plp, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, T . Clausen, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, dreammoose, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/21
    • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/21
• RE: [OM] megapixel madness?, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/15
  • Re: [OM] megapixel madness?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/15

[OM] 20 mm Macro lens question, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] 20 mm Macro lens question, dreammoose, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] 20 mm Macro lens question, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] 20 mm Macro lens question, Alan Wood, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] 20 mm Macro lens question, Alexander Wilson, 2002/09/13

[OM] part 3 and wedding coming up, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/12

• RE: [OM] part 3 and wedding coming up, Robin's Nest Photography, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] part 3 and wedding coming up, John A. Lind, 2002/09/13

RE: [OM] Tamron 500/8 mirror - better resolution than Zuiko, but pooer contrast. $150, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] Tamron 500/8 mirror - better resolution than Zuiko, but pooer contrast. $150, Roger Wesson, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] Tamron 500/8 mirror - better resolution than Zuiko, but pooer contrast. $150, Andre Goforth, 2002/09/12

[OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, plp, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, Paul Farrar, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, dreammoose, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/13
• [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, Paul Farrar, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, ALEXSCIFI, 2002/09/12
• Re:[OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, plp, 2002/09/13
• Re:[OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Cap for 28/2 lens hood, plp, 2002/09/13

RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, w shumaker, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
    • [OM] [OT] MicroDrives, was Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, siddiq, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] MicroDrives, was Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, dreammoose, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Tal Lancaster, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• Re:[OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, plp, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, plp, 2002/09/12
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, plp, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, AG Schnozz, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, suchismit, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/13
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Jez . Cunningham, 2002/09/13
  • RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, T . Clausen, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, William Clark, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/14

[OM] Re: >OT< Judge trashes P*Y*AL rules, Thomas A Simmons, 2002/09/12

• [OM] [OT] Canon announces 11 Megapixel EOS, Garth Wood, 2002/09/12

[OM] 1st WORKING Full-Frame CCD, William Clark, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] 1st WORKING Full-Frame CCD, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12

Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/12

• Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, John Hermanson, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Rand E. Tomcala, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas, 2002/09/12

[OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Donald MacDonald, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Chris Barker, 2002/09/13
• Re: [OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/12
  • Re: [OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Gary Edwards, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Mike, 2002/09/12
  • Re: [OM] Jets and Rocks; WAS an OM weekend, Ed Senior, 2002/09/12

[OM] scanners, Bill Pearce, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] scanners, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] scanners, w shumaker, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] scanners, ll . clark, 2002/09/13

Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/11
  • RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11
    • [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Michael, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Rand E. Tomcala, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, John Hermanson, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Pen F to OM adadpter, iwert, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Walt Wayman, 2002/09/11
  • RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Ian BManners, 2002/09/11
    • Re: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
  • RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/12

[OM] An (OT) Noise vs. Poetry (was OM Weekend), Doggre, 2002/09/11

• RE: [OM] An (OT) Noise vs. Poetry (was OM Weekend), Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/11

[OM] Storing & Retrieving Film ?, Jeff Keller, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] Storing & Retrieving Film ?, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/12
• Re: [OM] Storing & Retrieving Film ?, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/12

[OM] Zoom 28-105 3.5-4.5, Angel Lobo, 2002/09/11

• [OM] Zoom 28-105 3.5-4.5, Brian Swale, 2002/09/12

[OM] a few items FS, gries, 2002/09/11

• [OM] [FS] some items and also [WTB/WTT] items, M. Lloyd, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] [FS] some items and also [WTB/WTT] items, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12

[OM] Battery Eaters, Doggre, 2002/09/11

• RE: [OM] Battery Eaters, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Battery Eaters, dreammoose, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] Battery Eaters, julian_davies, 2002/09/11
• [OM] Battery Eaters, Doggre, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] Battery Eaters, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] Battery Eaters, CyberSimian, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] Battery Eaters, Julian Davies, 2002/09/15
• Re: [OM] Battery Eaters, John Cwiklinski, 2002/09/12
• [OM] Battery Eaters, Doggre, 2002/09/12

RE: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Po ol, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Pool, Tom Scales, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Po ol, Winsor Crosby, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Po ol, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Po ol, Scott Gomez, 2002/09/11
  • RE: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Po ol, T . Clausen, 2002/09/12

[OM] XA's lens patent number, notaris, 2002/09/11

• RE: [OM] XA's lens patent number, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/11

[OM] RE: zoom v. prime - and falling rocks, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] RE: zoom v. prime - and falling rocks, dreammoose, 2002/09/12

[OM] Monopod Technique, Doggre, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] Monopod Technique, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/11
  • RE: [OM] Monopod Technique, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] Monopod Technique, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/11
• RE: [OM] Monopod Technique, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/12

[OM] OT Windows 98 question, Mike, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Scales, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Garth Wood, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Mike, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Scales, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, siddiq, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Wagner, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Clemente Colayco, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Scales, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Tom Wagner, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, AB, 2002/09/12
• RE: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Daniel J. Mitchell, 2002/09/12
  • Re: RE: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, siddiq, 2002/09/12
  • RE: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Olaf Greve, 2002/09/13
• RE: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Mike, 2002/09/12
  • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Bill Stanke, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, siddiq, 2002/09/13
    • Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question, Larry, 2002/09/13

[OM] Handholding 200/4, plp, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] Handholding 200/4, siddiq, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Handholding 200/4, Lee Penzias, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Handholding 200/4, NSURIT, 2002/09/11

[OM] FS: Various 49mm Filters - UPDATE, Matt Crawley, 2002/09/11

• [OM] FS: Various 49mm Filters - UPDATE, Matt Crawley, 2002/09/12

RE: [OM] XAs and Ansel Adams at 100, Henry Bottjer-BA, 2002/09/11

• Re: [OM] XAs and Ansel Adams at 100, Jim Brokaw, 2002/09/11

RE: [OM] Score! was: Fang! possibly two, Brian Swale, 2002/09/11

• RE: [OM] Score! was: Fang! possibly two, Timpe, Jim, 2002/09/11

[OM] Which film scanner, Robert Near, 2002/09/11

• [OM] Rare item: 250 film back with film magazines on Ebay, M. Lloyd, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Tom Scales, 2002/09/11
• Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/11
  • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/11
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/11
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/11
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Tim Chakravorty, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, C.H.Ling, 2002/09/12
    • Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/26
• Re: Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/12
• Re: Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Wayne Harridge, 2002/09/12
  • Re: Re: [OM] Which film scanner, Richard F. Man, 2002/09/12