At 21:07 9/13/02, Matt Crawley wrote:
Have any of you had problems with too much red in the skin tones using
Provia?
No, at least not assignable to the film itself. I have seen these symptoms
occur using all "general purpose" chromes with:
(a) underexposure which tends to increase reversal saturation
(b) too close with a harsh flash at higher ratios of flash to ambient
I think this might ONLY be a problem with very fair skinned people but my 1
year old girl looks a little red & blotchy with Provia.
If I've interpreted your description accurately, they both relate to this
in different ways. Very fair skin is more translucent and tends to have
more of a pink cast to it. This is caused by higher than average skin
translucence allowing blood in the capillaries near the skin's surface to
show through. Increased saturation with underexposure of chrome films
picks up on the pink cast and accentuates it. With higher power levels of
electronic flash, some of the light travels into the skin, reflects off of
the blood in the capillaries and travels back out to the camera lens. The
higher the ratio of flash to ambient, and the closer the flash, the greater
the sub-surface reflection.
Anyone use Astia?
Yes. It's also good, but IMO does not have quite as much apparent
sharpness (acuity) as Provia 100F (RDP III).
I think it goes Velvia for mega color, Provia for all round and Astia for
portraits...
I would describe it as:
Velvia for mega color (presuming this means highly saturated), Provia 100F
for general purpose and Astia for more restrained saturation and slightly
less acuity than Provia. BTW, Astia *is* Sensia 100, a consumer film.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|