I think the point J. Williams is trying to make is no matter how steady your
hands, there is
a final limit placed on picture sharpness by something you have no control
over, ie
the fact that your heart beats.
Unless of course, you trigger the self timer and go into suspended animation...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:51 PM
Subject: Re:[OM] lens discussion - N*k*n etc
> This almost makes sense, except that: the camera isn't sitting on your vein
> and get affected by the "pulse modulation" :-) directly. i.e. can you (or
> J Williams) prove that a camera move anywhere close to 200 microns in
> 1/10th while being handheld due to the pulse? It probably moves that much
> or more (?) simply because the camera holder has slightly shaky hands and
> has nothing to do w/ pulse!
>
> But of course if he or she is dead, then yes, that won't be any camera
> movement per se.
>
>
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>. We had a server CRASH :-( Please
> rejoin ImageCraft mailing lists <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
> [ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|