| Subject: | [OM] Has the vapor condensed? |
|---|---|
| From: | "Daniel J. Mitchell" <DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:49:25 -0600 |
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02091903siliconfilmagain.asp That's one of the worst drawings of a "real" thing I've seen in a long time, mind you. And what do you want to bet that "Supports "most 35 mm SLRs" " doesn't include OM? -- dan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Some very interesting stats....../Digital transition, Winsor Crosby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM bodies vs. Contax Aria (was: OM-4Ti), Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas |
| Previous by Thread: | ( OM ) Was Re: [OM] Totally OT: airplanes and humidity, Brian Swale |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Has the vapor condensed?, Winsor Crosby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |