Jim,
Too bad they have been cut. I would have been happy to scanned them for you
on the Nikon, but they speedy way is a roll at a time. Unfortunately, you
don't want to wait the length of time it would take me to do 4 at a time.
Honestly, though, I'll bet renting is very expensive. By the time you rent
for a few days, you could buy a good scanner. I know it's pricey, but I'd
consider it.
Tom
> I need to rent a film scanner but no one rents them in
> Cincinnati.
>
> I'm really, really disappointed with the Picture CD
> results from Target. I gave them 3 rolls of concert
> photos to do and it was a waste of money. They were
> all blurry and even the skin tones of the flash shots
> were ruddy.
>
> They didn't even rotate the verticals and the balance
> was really awful.
>
> I admit that the available light shots need a big
> correction as I used daylight C-41 under tungsten.
> I've been getting much better results with my simple
> film scanner attachment (at 1200 dpi) for the flat bed
> scanner but I've spent hours just scanning the first 9
> frames of the 7 roll project!
>
> Does anyone have any ideas, besides buying a dedicated
> and *automated* film scanner? I need to be able to
> set up a correction, feed it a strip of 4 (now that
> everything's been cut!) and walk away.
>
> I may have to buy a scanner at MicroCenter. Other
> ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jim
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|