In my case, full frame, or close to it, is important because I prefer
wide-angle lenses -- 21, 18, 16.
No way could I ever afford the glass to do 16 well on a 4/3" sensor.
Tom
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Tom Scales wrote:
> > Unfortunately, everyone else is passing them by. 4/3" when both Kodak
(!)
> > and Canon have introduced full-frame?
>
> I'm not so sure that full-frame 35 is necessarily that important. What's
the
> goal here? I would contend that it's resolution, not absolute image sensor
> size, once you've made the decision to abandon your existing lens mount.
So
> what if the normal lens is a 24 isntead of a 50?
<snip>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|