Subject: | [OM] scanners |
---|---|
From: | "Bill Pearce" <bspearce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:04:52 -0500 |
I have been using a friend's Nikon 4000. I don't think I would buy one, unless I have tried a Polaroid. The Nikon really needs ICE and GEM, as it "enhances" every little thing, and reproduces the grain to excess. I understand the light source in the polaroid reduces that problem. Bill Pearce < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] 18/3.5 in the UK, julian_davies |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Common Courtesy Rant Retraction, Winsor Crosby |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] 18/3.5 in the UK, julian_davies |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] scanners, Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |