I'll add to this the comment that I have yet to see a digicam with decent
bokeh. What's out of focus looks *bad* to me. Nonetheless, digicams have
their uses...
---
Scott Gomez
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard F. Man [mailto:richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Subject: Re: [OM] More fuel for the Digi-Film debate?
At 10:55 AM 9/11/2002 +0800, CH Ling wrote:
>....
>The current problem of digital camera is:
>
>- the camera cost is still high.
>- many people still don't use a computer or know little about computer
>image processing. It is important for creating a high quality print.
>- there is no good wide angle lens supply at this moment (besides the
>0.5x or something add on lens).
>- the CCD size is too small, it does not provide the DOF feel like
>35mm not to mention the MF.
>- the resolution is still low, not suitable for landscapes.
>- it does not have the wide latitude of negative. Ok, you can use
>large amount of bracketing without involving film cost.
>- the time lag of most mid-end DC is still very slow.
>...
Of the above, the biggie is the lack of DOF. I hate everything is in focus
look of the digi-shots....
To add to that, unless it is an interchangeable lens system, you don't get
the choice of the prime lens to get the fast speed or special feature.
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|