ML Archiv: Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ]

Subject:	Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ]
From:	Andrew Beals <bandy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:09:09 -0700

dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx said:
> There are certainly a lot of great WA vistas in Yosemite. There are
> also  some fascinating 'distant vistas' up on the walls that require a
> long  lens.

I stand educated.  But any hints as to where&what?


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Digital SLR, (continued) Re: [OM] Digital SLR, tOM Trottier Re: [OM] Digital SLR, OM4Ti Re: [OM] Digital SLR, Tom Scales RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Jim Caldwell RE: [OM] Digital SLR, William Clark RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Winsor Crosby RE: [OM] Digital SLR, William Clark zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], Andrew Beals Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], Winsor Crosby Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], dreammoose Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], Andrew Beals <= Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], dreammoose RE: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], James N. McBride RE: [OM] Digital SLR, William Clark Re: [OM] Digital SLR, Tom Scales RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Jim Caldwell Re: [OM] Digital SLR, Andrew Beals Re: [OM] Digital SLR, John Hermanson RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Jim Caldwell RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Jim Caldwell RE: [OM] Digital SLR, Winsor Crosby

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Fang! possibly two, Tom
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] ( OM ) Records of shots taken. (was: Jumping into the Pool, dreammoose
Previous by Thread:	Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], dreammoose
Next by Thread:	Re: zoom v. prime [was: Re: [OM] Digital SLR ], dreammoose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]