My "box" which claimed to be XP ready had 128 ram, Anthlon
1.0 gig, 40 gig hd. I have added more ram (312 total)..all
seems to run fine since the upgrade from 98
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 06:49:08 +0800
"Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"what is the min set up to run Windows XP home? (cpu, ram,
"hd capacity etc ?
"
"----- Original Message -----
"From: "siddiq" <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
"To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 6:01 AM
"Subject: Re: [OM] OT Windows 98 question
"
"
"> 9/11/2002 8:50:06 AM, Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
">wrote:
">
"> >> Unlress your machine is underpowered for it, I would
">strongly suggest
"you
"> >> spend the $99 for Windows XP Home. The reliability
">differences alone
"are
"> >> enormous.
"> >>
"> >> Tom
"> >>
"> >Tom, You hit on the main reason I'm sticking with W98
">for now. I think @
"> >350mhz my box is marginal for XP. Plus the fact I'd
">have to get a new
"> >hard drive just to hold it all.
"> >
"> >Mike
">
"> There are a couple of ways to upgrade the entire box to
">the tune of 300 or
"less (ram, hdd, processor), and then it'll be ready for
"xp :)
">
">
">
">
"> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
">List >
"> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
"> < Web Page:
">http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
">
"
"
"< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List
">
"< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
"< Web Page:
"http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
"
<TEXTAREA NAME="Signature" ROWS="4" COLS="60">OM1n,OM2n
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|