Tako Mailing List Archives: Olympus OM System Mailing List (date)

Olympus OM System Mailing List (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

October 31, 2009

Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Moose, 23:58
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 23:39
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Chuck Norcutt, 23:38
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Chuck Norcutt, 23:34
[OM] Interesing high speed video of Canyon shutter bounce., Tim Hughes, 23:11
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Jim Couch, 22:34
[OM] Olympus F280 Flash, BIN $44.95, NSURIT, 22:00
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Moose, 21:54
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Moose, 21:53
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Moose, 21:46
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Moose, 21:26
Re: [OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, NSURIT, 21:07
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chris Barker, 20:51
Re: [OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, Chris Barker, 20:50
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, iwert bernakiewicz, 20:48
Re: [OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, Chuck Norcutt, 20:36
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Jeff Keller, 19:50
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Jeff Keller, 19:28
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Mike Lazzari, 19:27
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Mike Lazzari, 19:21
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Jim Couch, 19:12
Re: [OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, Jim Couch, 19:00
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 18:53
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, C.H.Ling, 18:28
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Jim Couch, 18:15
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Jim Couch, 18:14
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Keith Quarles, 16:56
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Chris Barker, 15:52
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 15:32
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Dawid Loubser, 15:10
Re: [OM] 250/2, Dawid Loubser, 15:02
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Brian Swale, 14:42
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Russ Butler, 14:32
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Joel Wilcox, 14:21
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Russ Butler, 14:04
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Joel Wilcox, 14:03
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Chris Barker, 14:01
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Chris Barker, 13:25
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:52
Re: [OM] ( OM ) MacKenzie, Bob Whitmire, 11:18
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Bob Whitmire, 11:16
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Chuck Norcutt, 11:11
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, andrew elliott, 10:53
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Alan Wood, 10:11
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 10:07
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 10:06
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 10:04
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 10:03
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 10:01
[OM] ( OM ) MacKenzie, Brian Swale, 09:59
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Moose, 09:54
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Andrew Fildes, 09:45
[OM] Nathan's PAD 30/10/2009: sunrise in the city, Nathan, 09:41
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Ian Manners, 09:20
Re: [OM] ( OM) Re: ( OM) Coyotes, Moose, 09:10
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Moose, 09:08
Re: [OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Wayne Harridge, 08:31
[OM] ( OM) Re: ( OM) Coyotes, Brian Swale, 08:28
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 08:08
[OM] Auto Bellows on digital bodies, Alan Wood, 08:05
Re: [OM] Spotted: Color-Heliar Voigtlander 75mm F2.5 SL for OM, Jeff Keller, 06:28
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Jeff Keller, 05:42
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Jeff Keller, 05:20
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Jeff Keller, 04:54
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Jeff Keller, 04:43
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Jeff Keller, 04:34
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Moose, 04:32
Re: [OM] 250/2, Moose, 04:14
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Moose, 03:59
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Moose, 03:49
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Moose, 03:48
[OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], usher99, 00:55
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, NSURIT, 00:54
Re: [OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Donald, 00:49
Re: [OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, NSURIT, 00:46
Re: [OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, usher99, 00:28
Re: [OM] 250/2, Andrew Fildes, 00:20
Re: [OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, Jim Nichols, 00:15
[OM] ( OM ) an off-topic question for rural USA-dwellers, Brian Swale, 00:06

October 30, 2009

[OM] Geocoding images [was A Few From Acadia National Park], Moose, 23:57
Re: [OM] 250/2, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:50
Re: [OM] 250/2, Chuck Norcutt, 23:07
Re: [OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, Ken Norton, 22:51
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Ken Norton, 22:40
Re: [OM] 250/2, Moose, 22:28
Re: [OM] 250/2, Moose, 22:27
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Moose, 22:25
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Andrew Fildes, 21:59
Re: [OM] 250/2, Moose, 21:56
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Moose, 21:49
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Moose, 21:43
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, John Hudson, 21:25
Re: [OM] 250/2, John Hudson, 21:24
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Andrew Fildes, 21:20
Re: [OM] 250/2, Andrew Fildes, 21:19
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Andrew Fildes, 21:17
Re: [OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, Tim Hughes, 20:47
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Ken Norton, 20:04
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:12
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Joel Wilcox, 18:51
Re: [OM] 250/2, Chuck Norcutt, 17:00
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 16:58
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Chuck Norcutt, 16:55
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 16:53
Re: [OM] 250/2, Ken Norton, 16:49
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 16:47
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Chris Barker, 16:29
Re: [OM] 250/2, Jez Cunningham, 16:16
Re: [OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, C.H.Ling, 16:00
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:54
[OM] FL36 gone t*ts-up, Chris Barker, 15:43
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 29/10/2009: waiting, Ken Norton, 15:21
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:17
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Ken Norton, 15:15
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 15:08
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Chuck Norcutt, 15:06
Re: [OM] 250/2, Chuck Norcutt, 15:05
Re: [OM] 250/2, Dawid Loubser, 15:02
Re: [OM] 250/2, Dawid Loubser, 14:57
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 14:50
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Dawid Loubser, 14:49
Re: [OM] 250/2, SwissPace, 14:41
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Ken Norton, 14:40
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:35
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 14:30
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Ken Norton, 14:25
[OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, usher99, 14:24
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Joel Wilcox, 14:23
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Chuck Norcutt, 14:18
Re: [OM] 250/2, Sawyer, Edward, 14:03
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Chuck Norcutt, 13:56
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, John Hermanson, 13:29
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 13:24
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Dawid Loubser, 13:23
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Dawid Loubser, 13:17
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, John Hermanson, 13:13
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, John Hermanson, 13:11
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Bob Whitmire, 13:00
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Joel Wilcox, 12:55
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Chris Crawford, 12:42
Re: [OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Wiliam Wagenaar, 12:37
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 29/10/2009: waiting, Jez Cunningham, 12:21
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:18
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Donald, 12:16
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 29/10/2009: waiting, John Hudson, 12:02
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Jez Cunningham, 12:00
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, John Hudson, 11:57
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Chuck Norcutt, 11:48
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 11:14
[OM] ( OM ) Coyotes, Brian Swale, 09:59
[OM] Show me some 250/2.0 shots please!, Dawid Loubser, 08:01
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, iwert bernakiewicz, 07:28
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 07:25
[OM] Nathan's PAD 29/10/2009: waiting, Nathan, 06:56
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Marc Lawrence, 04:50
Re: [OM] for AG, NSURIT, 04:25
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Brian Swale, 04:00
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Brian Swale, 03:56
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Brian Swale, 03:55
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Daniel Sepke, 03:53
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, AS, 02:58
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Rand E, 02:36
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 01:36
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 01:32
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 01:25
[OM] for AG, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 01:20
[OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, usher99, 01:16
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Daniel Sepke, 01:13
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 01:11
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Daniel Sepke, 01:06
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, C.H.Ling, 01:04
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 01:00
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 00:49
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 00:29
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 00:24
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 00:22
Re: [OM] Moon & Clouds, Mt. Desert Is., Moose, 00:20
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Moose, 00:07

October 29, 2009

Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Moose, 23:52
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 23:50
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Moose, 23:50
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 23:48
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 23:44
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Moose, 23:38
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Moose, 22:33
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, Moose, 22:30
Re: [OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, David Bell, 22:26
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 22:25
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Russ Butler, 22:23
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Rand E, 22:21
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, Chris Barker, 22:20
Re: [OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, Chris Barker, 22:16
Re: [OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, Chris Barker, 22:14
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, Chris Barker, 22:13
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chris Barker, 22:11
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Russ Butler, 22:06
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Andrew Fildes, 21:42
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Andrew Fildes, 21:35
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 20:57
Re: [OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Chuck Norcutt, 20:49
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 20:41
Re: [OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, Chuck Norcutt, 20:36
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 20:34
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Paul Laughlin, 19:56
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Moose, 19:52
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, John Hudson, 19:45
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, Donald, 19:24
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Rand E, 18:47
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 18:39
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Ken Norton, 18:38
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Joel Wilcox, 18:24
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, AS, 18:16
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, Ken Norton, 18:02
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, SwissPace, 17:54
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 17:53
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Mike Lazzari, 17:45
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Jim Nichols, 17:27
[OM] The results... was: adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 17:23
[OM] [OT] Anyone know about Early Aviation stuff in UK?, David Bell, 17:18
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Jim Nichols, 17:14
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 16:58
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 16:49
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 16:47
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 16:41
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Ken Norton, 16:40
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Charles Geilfuss, 16:33
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 16:26
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Ken Norton, 16:17
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Ken Norton, 16:14
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 16:13
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 16:05
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Jim Couch, 16:02
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Rand E, 15:47
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:28
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:25
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:24
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:19
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 15:15
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Charles Geilfuss, 15:11
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, John Hudson, 15:09
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 15:02
Re: [OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Chuck Norcutt, 14:59
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Ken Norton, 14:57
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, John Hudson, 14:48
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, John Hermanson, 14:33
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Charles Geilfuss, 14:33
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Ian Manners, 14:24
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Sue Pearce, 14:01
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 13:42
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 13:39
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, John Hermanson, 13:39
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, John Hermanson, 13:37
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, John Hermanson, 13:36
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, John Hermanson, 13:27
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, John Hermanson, 13:23
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Ken Norton, 12:57
[OM] ( OM ) New photos - non-film, sorry, Brian Swale, 12:52
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 12:15
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 11:58
Re: [OM] A few sunset shots, Chuck Norcutt, 11:25
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Chuck Norcutt, 11:19
Re: [OM] Moon & Clouds, Mt. Desert Is., Chuck Norcutt, 11:17
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 11:14
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 11:13
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chuck Norcutt, 11:09
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Wayne Harridge, 10:58
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Wayne Harridge, 10:54
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Wayne Harridge, 10:42
[OM] A few sunset shots, Michael Wong, 09:20
Re: [OM] Moon & Clouds, Mt. Desert Is., Chris Barker, 07:44
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chris Barker, 07:43
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Marc Lawrence, 07:32
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chris Barker, 07:31
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chris Barker, 07:29
Re: [OM] Moon & Clouds, Mt. Desert Is., Chris Crawford, 06:26
[OM] Moon & Clouds, Mt. Desert Is., Moose, 06:19
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Moose, 06:14
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Jim Couch, 05:58
Re: [OM] Olympus E-P2 soon???, Jim Couch, 05:54
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Sue Pearce, 03:03
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, AS, 02:58
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Chuck Norcutt, 02:11
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Daniel Sepke, 01:16
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 00:43
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 00:40
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Sue Pearce, 00:25
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Jim Nichols, 00:13

October 28, 2009

Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 23:38
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Sue Pearce, 23:21
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chuck Norcutt, 23:06
Re: [OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 22:58
[OM] OT: Printers, Candace Lemarr, 22:53
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 22:07
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 22:04
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Sue Pearce, 22:02
[OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, usher99, 21:38
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Andrew Fildes, 21:26
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 21:18
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 21:15
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 21:13
[OM] Nathan's PAD 25/10/2009 and 28/10/2009: legs and beach, Nathan Wajsman, 20:48
Re: [OM] free E-1 Focussing screen FS-1, iwert bernakiewicz, 20:00
Re: [OM] free E-1 protective covers, iwert bernakiewicz, 19:28
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 19:26
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Russ Butler, 19:07
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Charles Geilfuss, 18:44
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Jim Nichols, 18:33
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 18:03
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 18:02
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Charles Geilfuss, 17:50
Re: [OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Chuck Norcutt, 16:53
[OM] (OT) A Few From Acadia National Park, Bob Whitmire, 16:15
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Ian Manners, 16:09
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Ian Manners, 16:05
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Ken Norton, 16:05
Re: [OM] Olympus E-P2 soon???, photo, 16:00
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Ken Norton, 15:53
Re: [OM] Olympus E-P2 soon???, Ken Norton, 15:43
Re: [OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Jim Nichols, 15:38
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Ken Norton, 15:30
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Sue Pearce, 15:19
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, John Hermanson, 15:00
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, John Hermanson, 14:57
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, John Hermanson, 14:53
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, John Hermanson, 14:49
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Sue Pearce, 14:47
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Sue Pearce, 14:44
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Charles Geilfuss, 14:39
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 23/10/2009: a warm autumn evening, Carlos J. Santisteban, 14:37
Re: [OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, Carlos J. Santisteban, 14:33
[OM] Olympus E-P2 soon???, David Irisarri Vila, 14:32
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Carlos J. Santisteban, 14:29
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Carlos J. Santisteban, 14:19
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 14:01
Re: [OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Marc Lawrence, 13:59
Re: [OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Bob Whitmire, 13:46
Re: [OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Marc Lawrence, 13:13
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, John Hermanson, 13:09
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, SwissPace, 12:50
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Bob Whitmire, 12:37
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Bob Whitmire, 12:35
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:28
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Wayne Harridge, 11:51
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Chuck Norcutt, 10:59
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 10:53
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Chuck Norcutt, 10:51
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Wayne Harridge, 10:43
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Ian Manners, 10:30
Re: [OM] Palm After Dark, Wayne Harridge, 10:29
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Chuck Norcutt, 10:16
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, iwert bernakiewicz, 07:28
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Richard Man, 07:17
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Dawid Loubser, 07:11
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 07:08
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Nathan Wajsman, 07:01
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Chris Crawford, 06:55
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Moose, 06:46
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Andrew Fildes, 06:35
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Marc Lawrence, 06:34
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Moose, 06:03
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Richard Man, 05:56
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Moose, 05:50
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Andrew Fildes, 05:29
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Jim Couch, 05:20
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Ken Norton, 05:15
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, Moose, 05:14
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Moose, 05:09
[OM] Palm After Dark, Ken Norton, 05:08
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Andrew Fildes, 05:05
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Moose, 05:03
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Sue Pearce, 04:50
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Sue Pearce, 04:49
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Moose, 04:48
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Chris Crawford, 04:43
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Moose, 04:35
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Mike Lazzari, 04:33
Re: [OM] Yet another stupid question, Ian Manners, 04:28
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Don Holbrook, 04:26
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Ian Manners, 04:21
[OM] Yet another stupid question, Willie Wonka, 03:58
Re: [OM] Got a stupid questions, Jim Nichols, 03:56
[OM] Got a stupid questions, Willie Wonka, 03:48
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 02:19
[OM] some Fall shots, usher99, 00:45
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used byeverybody else?, Sue Pearce, 00:37
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, usher99, 00:30
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Russ Butler, 00:02

October 27, 2009

Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Marc Lawrence, 23:55
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Marc Lawrence, 23:33
[OM] some Fall shots, usher99, 23:28
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Ken Norton, 23:25
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Rickard Nilsson, 23:24
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Sue Pearce, 23:10
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Jim Couch, 22:50
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Bob Whitmire, 22:23
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Russ Butler, 21:59
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Russ Butler, 21:57
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Joel Wilcox, 21:19
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Andrew Fildes, 21:01
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, iwert bernakiewicz, 20:28
Re: [OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Jim Nichols, 19:52
Re: [OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Russ Butler, 19:45
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, Chris Barker, 19:43
Re: [OM] OT Super 8 to DVD, Sue Pearce, 19:22
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Chuck Norcutt, 18:45
Re: [OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Chuck Norcutt, 18:38
Re: [OM] some Fall shots, Jim Nichols, 18:37
[OM] some Fall shots, Russ Butler, 18:31
Re: [OM] OT Super 8 to DVD, Piers Hemy, 18:25
Re: [OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Jim Nichols, 17:43
Re: [OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Chuck Norcutt, 17:37
[OM] IMG: Before the Cleanup, Jim Nichols, 17:23
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used byeverybody else?, Dawid Loubser, 15:57
[OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, usher99, 15:42
[OM] OT Super 8 to DVD, Mike Bloor, 15:35
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Bob Whitmire, 15:34
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Ken Norton, 15:13
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used byeverybody else?, Ken Norton, 15:03
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Ken Norton, 14:56
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 14:52
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, NSURIT, 14:35
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Sue Pearce, 14:33
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used byeverybody else?, Sue Pearce, 14:28
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, NSURIT, 14:27
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, NSURIT, 14:21
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Chuck Norcutt, 14:18
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Don Holbrook, 13:56
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Willie Wonka, 13:45
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, Russ Butler, 13:41
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Joel Wilcox, 13:39
Re: [OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, Chuck Norcutt, 13:31
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, John Hermanson, 13:28
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Russ Butler, 13:26
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, John Hermanson, 13:21
[OM] Oktoberfest in Baden, SwissPace, 12:59
Re: [OM] (img) US memories, Chuck Norcutt, 11:29
[OM] (img) US memories, iwert bernakiewicz, 11:23
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Chuck Norcutt, 10:57
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Wayne Harridge, 10:55
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, iwert bernakiewicz, 10:53
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used byeverybody else?, C.H.Ling, 10:52
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Andrew Fildes, 10:11
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, iwert bernakiewicz, 10:07
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, iwert bernakiewicz, 09:59
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Wayne Harridge, 09:58
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Andrew Fildes, 09:55
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Andrew Fildes, 09:44
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, iwert bernakiewicz, 09:33
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 42: water and wine, Nathan Wajsman, 07:39
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, C.H.Ling, 06:56
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Wayne Harridge, 06:43
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, C.H.Ling, 05:40
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:26
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Ken Norton, 04:23
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Jim Couch, 04:02
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Chuck Norcutt, 03:54
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 03:49
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:36
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Sue Pearce, 03:12
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Willie Wonka, 02:21
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, C.H.Ling, 01:58
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:16

October 26, 2009

Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Sue Pearce, 23:01
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Andrew Fildes, 21:29
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 21:07
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Chuck Norcutt, 21:01
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 20:59
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, iwert bernakiewicz, 20:54
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Chuck Norcutt, 20:50
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 20:45
Re: [OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Chuck Norcutt, 20:37
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Paul Laughlin, 20:26
Re: [OM] OM4T problems, Charles Geilfuss, 20:23
[OM] OM4T problems, Mike Lazzari, 20:05
[OM] IMG: One Last Bloom, Jim Nichols, 19:20
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Chuck Norcutt, 19:16
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Sue Pearce, 18:44
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Sue Pearce, 18:43
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Chuck Norcutt, 18:28
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 17:36
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Joel Wilcox, 17:27
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Ken Norton, 17:21
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Ken Norton, 17:06
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Ken Norton, 17:00
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Chuck Norcutt, 16:38
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Dawid Loubser, 16:34
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Joel Wilcox, 16:33
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Jez Cunningham, 16:32
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Ken Norton, 16:25
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Donald, 16:17
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Sue Pearce, 16:15
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Joel Wilcox, 16:06
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, John Hermanson, 14:40
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybodyelse?, iwert bernakiewicz, 14:14
Re: [OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, Charles Geilfuss, 14:13
Re: [OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybodyelse?, C.H.Ling, 14:11
[OM] How long before we see the micro 4/3 concept used by everybody else?, Chuck Norcutt, 13:33
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Wayne Harridge, 13:26
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Jez Cunningham, 13:12
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/Vhell...], C.H.Ling, 13:10
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Chuck Norcutt, 13:01
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Jez Cunningham, 12:24
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 12:22
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:20
Re: [OM] IMG: PAW 42 Phx's - Autumn & Xmas, yes, already ..., Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:15
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:10
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Andrew Fildes, 11:34
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:09
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:08
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:07
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:06
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:05
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:02
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Dawid Loubser, 06:49
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 04:38
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 03:19
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:39
Re: [OM] LCE, was: An impressive shot, bwhitmire, 00:38
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, John Hudson, 00:17

October 25, 2009

Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 23:01
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Marc Lawrence, 22:59
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton, 22:46
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton, 22:45
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 22:07
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Andrew Fildes, 21:57
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ws, 21:03
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 20:37
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton, 20:36
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 19:48
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton, 19:38
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Paul, 17:46
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ws, 17:34
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Paul Laughlin, 17:27
Re: [OM] OT, For Moose, Paul Laughlin, 17:18
Re: [OM] Retouchng pictures, Chuck Norcutt, 16:50
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 16:48
[OM] Retouchng pictures, Willie Wonka, 16:27
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, John Hudson, 16:15
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton, 16:09
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt, 14:51
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, C.H.Ling, 13:45
Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Clay Nichols, 12:43
[OM] Hasselblad demise essay, Tim Hughes, 12:13
[OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Tim Hughes, 10:56
Re: [OM] Bronx Se�orita, C.H.Ling, 10:46
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Moose, 10:17
Re: [OM] OT, For Moose, Moose, 09:56
[OM] Nathan's PAD 24/10/2009: señoritas with cava, Nathan Wajsman, 07:19
Re: [OM] Bronx Se�orita, C.H.Ling, 06:33
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Andrew Fildes, 05:53
[OM] OT, For Moose, Paul Laughlin, 04:20
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita II, Sue Pearce, 04:13
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita II, Jim Nichols, 03:36
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita II, Moose, 01:50
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Moose, 00:00

October 24, 2009

Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Moose, 23:52
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, AS, 23:37
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, NSURIT, 23:31
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Jim Couch, 23:26
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Chuck Norcutt, 23:07
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, NSURIT, 22:40
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Ken Norton, 22:24
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, NSURIT, 22:03
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Moose, 21:13
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., NSURIT, 19:11
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, NSURIT, 19:07
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, NSURIT, 19:05
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., iwert bernakiewicz, 16:56
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., Joel Wilcox, 16:13
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Ken Norton, 16:04
Re: [OM] Bronx Señorita, Jim Nichols, 07:11
[OM] Nathan's PAD 23/10/2009: a warm autumn evening, Nathan Wajsman, 06:54
[OM] Bronx Señorita, Moose, 06:28
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., Moose, 05:08
Re: [OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, Jim Nichols, 04:13
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., Bob Docherty, 04:10
Re: [OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, C.H.Ling, 04:03
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., Ken Norton, 02:17
[OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, usher99, 02:08
Re: [OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, Ken Norton, 02:03
Re: [OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, Jim Nichols, 01:51
Re: [OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, Chuck Norcutt, 01:41
Re: [OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., Moose, 01:36
Re: [OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 01:21
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Moose, 01:15
[OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., usher99, 00:48
[OM] IMG: Overnight, Color Appeared in the Neighborhood, Jim Nichols, 00:21

October 23, 2009

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 21/10/2009: fascist graffiti on our beach promenade, Nathan Wajsman, 22:57
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 21/10/2009: fascist graffiti on our beach promenade, Charles Geilfuss, 22:49
[OM] Nathan's PAD 21/10/2009: fascist graffiti on our beach promenade, Nathan Wajsman, 22:35
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 21:24
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Richard Man, 21:10
[OM] Can't believe this happened! Hope it didn't happen to you., NSURIT, 21:08
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 20:19
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 19:54
Re: [OM] LCE, was: An impressive shot, Mike Lazzari, 19:39
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 19:24
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Donald, 19:12
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 18:37
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Dawid Loubser, 18:05
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 19/10/2009: an attempt at fuzzylogics, AS, 18:03
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 17:56
Re: [OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, Ken Norton, 17:22
Re: [OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Ken Norton, 17:05
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 16:51
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 16:30
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 15:36
Re: [OM] Australian Customs, John Hermanson, 14:48
Re: [OM] Australian Customs, Wayne Harridge, 13:54
Re: [OM] Australian Customs, Wayne Harridge, 13:48
[OM] Couple vertical panoramics, Richard Man, 13:13
Re: [OM] Australian Customs, Ian Manners, 12:51
[OM] Jane Bown speaks about some of her best known portraits, James R, 12:46
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Chuck Norcutt, 11:47
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 10:12
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 19/10/2009: an attempt at fuzzylogics, Carlos J. Santisteban, 10:11
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 41: El Campello, Carlos J. Santisteban, 10:03
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Carlos J. Santisteban, 09:48
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Donald, 09:37
Re: [OM] Zuikos on 5D-II, was: Velvia Mood, Carlos J. Santisteban, 09:26
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Carlos J. Santisteban, 09:25
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Moose, 07:29
[OM] Australian Customs, Ian Manners, 07:27
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Moose, 07:19
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Nathan Wajsman, 06:37
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 41: El Campello, AS, 04:37
Re: [OM] Happy Snaps, Charlie Horse Dancer, 00:42
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 00:05

October 22, 2009

Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 23:46
Re: [OM] Auto extension tube BIN $95, NSURIT, 23:20
[OM] Auto extension tube BIN $95, NSURIT, 23:15
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Andrew Fildes, 22:20
Re: [OM] mamiya lenses, print exchange, Ken Norton, 20:12
Re: [OM] mamiya lenses, print exchange, Richard Man, 20:02
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Charles Geilfuss, 18:53
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 18:21
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 17:46
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 17:24
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 17:18
Re: [OM] mamiya lenses, print exchange, Dawid Loubser, 17:15
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 16:32
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, C.H.Ling, 16:24
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 15:53
Re: [OM] LCE, was: An impressive shot, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 15:04
Re: [OM] mamiya lenses, print exchange, Sawyer, Edward, 15:00
Re: [OM] Printer Update, John Hermanson, 14:15
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 13:22
[OM] LCE, was: An impressive shot, Chuck Norcutt, 12:21
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 12:20
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Wayne Harridge, 11:36
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 10:09
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Moose, 10:01
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 10:00
Re: [OM] Happy Snaps, Bob Whitmire, 05:06
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 05:05
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 04:37
[OM] Happy Snaps, Tom Fenwick, 03:25
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Wayne Harridge, 03:11
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, C.H.Ling, 03:08
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 03:01
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Chris Crawford, 01:35
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 01:29
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 01:27
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 01:14
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 01:12
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 01:10
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Chuck Norcutt, 01:00
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 00:53
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Chris Crawford, 00:51
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Moose, 00:37
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Wayne Harridge, 00:28
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Jim Couch, 00:22
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Chuck Norcutt, 00:20
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Nicoletta Da Ros, 00:13
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 00:11
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 00:08
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Sue Pearce, 00:07
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Ken Norton, 00:04
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Sue Pearce, 00:03
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Sue Pearce, 00:01

October 21, 2009

Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Ken Norton, 23:51
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Moose, 23:46
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Moose, 23:31
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 23:24
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Moose, 23:20
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Moose, 23:18
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Ian Nichols, 23:14
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 23:14
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 23:13
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Ian Nichols, 23:08
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Nicoletta Da Ros, 23:06
Re: [OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Richard Man, 23:03
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Dawid Loubser, 23:00
[OM] OT: Why are the Mamiya Lenses so good?, Dawid Loubser, 22:59
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 22:53
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Sue Pearce, 22:51
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:44
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Nathan Wajsman, 22:43
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 22:31
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:27
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:27
[OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, usher99, 22:20
Re: [OM] Wet Print Exchange, Martyn Smoothy, 22:19
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Andrew Fildes, 22:11
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Andrew Fildes, 22:11
[OM] Spotted: Color-Heliar Voigtlander 75mm F2.5 SL for OM, usher99, 22:09
[OM] CA, usher99, 21:55
[OM] Wet Print Exchange, Richard Man, 21:10
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Donald, 20:16
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Jim Nichols, 20:01
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Jim Nichols, 19:56
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Chuck Norcutt, 19:55
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Jim Nichols, 19:52
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Rand E, 19:46
Re: [OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Clay Nichols, 19:45
[OM] IMG: Mushroom on Steroids, Jim Nichols, 19:23
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Ken Norton, 19:02
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 18:52
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Sue Pearce, 18:50
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Tom Fenwick, 18:40
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Sue Pearce, 18:13
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Ken Norton, 17:48
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Ken Norton, 17:45
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Ken Norton, 17:38
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 17:28
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Ken Norton, 17:22
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Chuck Norcutt, 17:19
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 17:17
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Ken Norton, 16:57
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Ken Norton, 16:30
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Ken Norton, 16:14
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Bob Whitmire, 16:12
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Sue Pearce, 15:57
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Sue Pearce, 15:56
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz, Style, Sue Pearce, 15:53
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, C.H.Ling, 15:49
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 15:36
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Chuck Norcutt, 14:45
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, C.H.Ling, 14:42
Re: [OM] Printer Update, John Hermanson, 14:02
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 13:46
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Jez Cunningham, 13:43
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 13:10
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz, Style, Dawid Loubser, 12:47
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Ian Nichols, 10:40
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Brian Swale, 10:29
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Andrew Fildes, 08:50
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Andrew Fildes, 08:36
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Wayne Harridge, 07:44
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Moose, 07:30
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Moose, 07:26
[OM] Spotted: Color-Heliar Voigtlander 75mm F2.5 SL for OM, Dawid Loubser, 07:24
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Nathan Wajsman, 07:13
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, C.H.Ling, 07:00
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Wayne Harridge, 06:51
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Moose, 06:35
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Moose, 06:29
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Moose, 06:13
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Moose, 06:05
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Joel Wilcox, 06:04
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Moose, 06:02
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Moose, 06:01
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, C.H.Ling, 05:31
Re: [OM] - didn't blew the highlights, but ..., Wayne Harridge, 04:13
Re: [OM] - didn't blew the highlights, but ..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:49
[OM] - didn't blew the highlights, but ..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:36
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, AS, 03:14
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 02:56
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, AS, 02:37
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Jim Couch, 02:34
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz, Style, Dean Hansen, 02:33
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Jim Couch, 02:32
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, C.H.Ling, 02:11
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, C.H.Ling, 02:05
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Chuck Norcutt, 01:27
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 01:25
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Jim Nichols, 01:21
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Chuck Norcutt, 01:13
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Sue Pearce, 00:31
[OM] - didn't blew the highlights, but ..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:15
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Chuck Norcutt, 00:12

October 20, 2009

Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 23:38
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Ken Norton, 23:24
Re: [OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:21
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Wayne Harridge, 23:15
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:13
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:10
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:06
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:04
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:59
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Andrew Fildes, 22:58
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Nathan Wajsman, 22:52
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:49
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, iwert bernakiewicz, 22:47
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:45
Re: [OM] CA, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:44
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Charles Geilfuss, 22:38
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:33
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Carlos J. Santisteban, 22:32
[OM] One for the CSI fans, Andrew Fildes, 22:29
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:28
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Andrew Fildes, 22:22
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Andrew Fildes, 22:18
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Sue Pearce, 22:08
Re: [OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, Charles Geilfuss, 22:05
[OM] [OT] new Canyon 1d Mk, AS, 22:01
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, philippe.amard, 21:27
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Jim Couch, 20:08
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, AS, 19:03
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 18:41
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 18:36
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Mike Lazzari, 18:27
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Chuck Norcutt, 17:59
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Jez Cunningham, 17:53
Re: [OM] Color mixer for digital imaging, Jez Cunningham, 17:38
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jez Cunningham, 17:37
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jez Cunningham, 17:36
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Charles Geilfuss, 17:26
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Ralf Loi, 17:06
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Ken Norton, 16:46
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Charles Geilfuss, 16:32
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 16:24
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Ralf Loi, 16:16
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Ken Norton, 16:11
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Jez Cunningham, 16:09
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Clay Nichols, 16:00
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Ken Norton, 15:55
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Jez Cunningham, 15:53
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Ken Norton, 15:49
Re: [OM] A milestone of sorts, Charles Geilfuss, 15:46
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Charles Geilfuss, 15:43
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Bob Whitmire, 15:39
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jez Cunningham, 15:36
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 41: El Campello, Bob Whitmire, 15:30
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Ralf Loi, 15:10
Re: [OM] Printer Update, John Hermanson, 15:09
Re: [OM] Printer Update, John Hermanson, 15:08
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Russ Butler, 14:47
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Joel Wilcox, 14:25
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 13:29
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Chuck Norcutt, 12:58
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Wayne Harridge, 12:22
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Chuck Norcutt, 12:19
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Chuck Norcutt, 12:09
Re: [OM] Leica wedding questions, was: E-P1 review, Sandy Harris, 12:03
[OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera, Brian Swale, 10:49
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jez Cunningham, 09:43
Re: [OM] IMG: PAW 42 Phx's - Autumn & Xmas, yes, already ..., C.H.Ling, 09:37
Re: [OM] A new toy., Jez Cunningham, 09:29
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Jez Cunningham, 09:24
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Andrew Fildes, 07:59
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Wayne Harridge, 07:49
Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, iwert bernakiewicz, 07:16
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Philippe Amard, 07:12
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Jim Couch, 06:55
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Jim Couch, 06:53
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 06:45
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Richard Man, 06:43
Re: [OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Nathan Wajsman, 06:41
[OM] Panorama - Crop? H or V?, Moose, 06:35
Re: [OM] IMG: PAW 42 Phx's - Autumn & Xmas, yes, already ..., Philippe Amard, 06:33
Re: [OM] A milestone of sorts, Chris Crawford, 06:20
[OM] A different view of Acadia, Moose, 06:15
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 06:12
[OM] A milestone of sorts, Ken Norton, 06:09
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Ken, Moose, 04:47
Re: [OM] IMG: PAW 42 Phx's - Autumn & Xmas, yes, already ..., AS, 04:14
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Willie Wonka, 03:45
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Willie Wonka, 03:38
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:42
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 19/10/2009: an attempt at fuzzylogics, Chuck Norcutt, 01:30

October 19, 2009

Re: [OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ian Manners, 23:57
[OM] 25 F0.95 - was E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ian Manners, 23:54
[OM] OM Manuals - free to a good home, Jon Mitchell, 23:39
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Ken Norton, 23:00
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Ken Norton, 22:58
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Michael Collins, 22:50
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Philippe Amard, 22:48
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Sue Pearce, 22:45
Re: [OM] Something a bit different..., Ken Norton, 22:39
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Ken Norton, 22:35
[OM] Nathan's PAD 19/10/2009: an attempt at fuzzylogics, Nathan Wajsman, 22:29
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Andrew, Philippe Amard, 22:27
[OM] Something a bit different..., Andrew Fildes, 22:24
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Ken, Andrew Fildes, 22:22
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Ken, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:19
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 22:15
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Ken, Philippe Amard, 22:11
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Ken Norton, 22:04
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 21:55
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Mike Lazzari, 19:50
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Ken Norton, 19:38
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Jim Couch, 19:24
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Jim Couch, 19:20
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Jim Couch, 19:14
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 18:37
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Ken Norton, 18:32
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 18:27
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, C.H.Ling, 18:18
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Ken Norton, 18:16
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Dawid Loubser, 18:04
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Ken Norton, 17:32
Re: [OM] E-P1 hands-on report - AG Schnozz Style, Carlos J. Santisteban, 16:22
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Ken Norton, 16:01
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 15:35
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 15:28
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Sue Pearce, 15:18
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Chuck Norcutt, 15:17
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Dawid Loubser, 15:03
Re: [OM] Printer Update, John Hermanson, 14:58
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 14:45
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Ralf Loi, 14:34
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010, Joel Wilcox, 14:25
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Joel Wilcox, 14:21
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Joel Wilcox, 14:01
Re: [OM] IMG: Two Thinkers, Joel Wilcox, 14:00
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Dawid Loubser, 13:34
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 41: El Campello, Chuck Norcutt, 13:20
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 12:59
Re: [OM] [SPAM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Andrew, Philippe Amard, 12:53
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 12:03
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Jez Cunningham, 11:50
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Philippe Amard, 11:38
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz, Brian Swale, 11:08
Re: [OM] [SPAM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Andrew, Andrew Fildes, 11:06
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Brian Swale, 10:59
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Andrew Fildes, 10:41
Re: [OM] [SPAM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Andrew, Philippe Amard, 10:34
[OM] IMG: PAW 42 Phx's - Autumn & Xmas, yes, already ..., Philippe Amard, 10:13
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Philippe Amard, 09:26
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 41: El Campello, Nathan Wajsman, 07:58
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Jim Couch, 06:15
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera until 2010, Jim Couch, 06:10
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Jim Couch, 06:05
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Jim Couch, 06:02
Re: [OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Joel Wilcox, 04:45
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Joel Wilcox, 04:35
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Sue Pearce, 04:06
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Joel Wilcox, 03:46
[OM] Portraits...., usher99, 03:04
Re: [OM] Portraits...., NSURIT, 01:37
[OM] Portraits...., Martyn Smoothy, 01:28
[OM] FS: (2 reviews),Olympus 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5 mkII Lens LNIB, Jim Couch, 01:08
Re: [OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Chuck Norcutt, 01:00
Re: [OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera until 2010, Chuck Norcutt, 00:58
[OM] ( OM ) Filters for digital, Brian Swale, 00:11

October 18, 2009

Re: [OM] WayneH - Olympus Auto Bellows, Wayne Harridge, 23:30
Re: [OM] [SPAM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Andrew Fildes, 22:07
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Chuck Norcutt, 22:02
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Philippe Amard, 20:50
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Chuck Norcutt, 20:48
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Chuck Norcutt, 20:46
[OM] Exposure Was: raw vs JPG Was:No E-System pro camera until 2010, Jim Couch, 20:45
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Jim Couch, 20:36
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Jim Couch, 20:33
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Jim Couch, 20:23
Re: [OM] FS: 50-200, Philippe Amard, 20:15
[OM] Still looking for a few empty 620 spools/rolls, NSURIT, 19:31
Re: [OM] decent price on hard to find double cable release, NSURIT, 19:24
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Mike Lazzari, 18:41
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Chuck Norcutt, 18:38
Re: [OM] decent price on hard to find double cable release, Bob Docherty, 18:06
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, David Bell, 17:58
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Chris Barker, 17:46
Re: [OM] FS: 50-200, Chris Barker, 17:26
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 17:25
[OM] FS: 50-200, Alan Krantz, 17:14
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010, Brian Swale, 17:05
[OM] Nathan's PAD 18/10/2009: autumn in Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 17:04
[OM] WayneH - Olympus Auto Bellows, Ian Manners, 16:25
[OM] IMG: Salon de la Photographie - Paris - Birding & Seniorita inclusive, Philippe Amard, 15:50
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Chuck Norcutt, 14:59
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Nathan Wajsman, 13:59
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Chuck Norcutt, 12:11
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Chuck Norcutt, 12:02
[OM] More on the Samsung DualView cameras + Nikon's projector camera, Chuck Norcutt, 11:33
Re: [OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Chris Barker, 11:02
Re: [OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Chris Barker, 11:01
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Moose, 09:56
[OM] IMG: Villajoyosa, Nathan Wajsman, 09:18
[OM] E-620 - first set of photos., Jim Couch, 08:05
[OM] decent price on hard to find double cable release, NSURIT, 06:11
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Chuck Norcutt, 04:06
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Sue Pearce, 00:52

October 17, 2009

Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Piers Hemy, 23:48
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 23:06
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Moose, 22:38
Re: [OM] Compact N camera includes projector !, Moose, 22:27
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Jim Couch, 22:00
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Moose, 21:11
Re: [OM] OT Binoculars, Sue Pearce, 20:05
[OM] OT Binoculars, Jim Couch, 19:54
Re: [OM] Compact N camera includes projector !, AS, 19:19
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, NSURIT, 16:06
Re: [OM] Father & child [Was: an impressive shot], Michael Wong, 14:38
Re: [OM] starving Africans, iwert bernakiewicz, 13:55
[OM] IMG: Two Thinkers, Richard Man, 13:48
Re: [OM] Father & child [Was: an impressive shot], Richard Man, 13:27
Re: [OM] Sony alpha sensor Technology, Chuck Norcutt, 12:30
[OM] Father & child [Was: an impressive shot], Michael Wong, 12:29
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Chuck Norcutt, 12:26
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Chuck Norcutt, 11:46
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 11:41
[OM] Sony alpha sensor Technology, Tim Hughes, 08:27
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Chris Barker, 07:34
[OM] Nathan's PAD 14/10/2009: serious rice, Nathan Wajsman, 07:18
[OM] Add-on Follow focus to manual lens, Tim Hughes, 06:48
Re: [OM] Compact N camera includes projector !, Russ Butler, 06:19
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], khen lim, 06:06
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, khen lim, 06:04
[OM] Compact N camera includes projector !, Tim Hughes, 06:03
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Ken Norton, 05:00
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, AS, 03:56
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:46
[OM] The hackers are at it again --Magiclantern hack--OM 5D11, usher99, 01:42
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Charlie Horse Dancer, 01:32
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, usher99, 01:31
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 01:30
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 12/10/2009: self-portrait, Willie Wonka, 00:59
[OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Willie Wonka, 00:47
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Donald, 00:46
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Richard Man, 00:31
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Donald, 00:16
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Willie Wonka, 00:14

October 16, 2009

Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Donald, 23:42
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Donald, 23:41
[OM] Chuck's gettin' better, usher99, 23:40
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Richard Man, 23:26
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Richard Man, 23:25
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Clay Nichols, 23:18
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Piers Hemy, 22:54
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Piers Hemy, 22:50
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Moose, 22:36
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 22:33
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Robert Burnette, 22:24
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Paul Laughlin, 20:59
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Candace Lemarr, 20:13
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Moose, 20:03
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Nathan Wajsman, 20:00
Re: [OM] starving Africans, Nathan Wajsman, 19:59
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Chuck Norcutt, 19:56
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Chris Barker, 19:33
Re: [OM] Pinnacle Studio video editing software, Ken Norton, 19:07
Re: [OM] Question for E-1 Users, Ken Norton, 19:03
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 19:00
[OM] Question for E-1 Users, Jim Nichols, 18:45
[OM] Pinnacle Studio video editing software, Charlie Horse Dancer, 18:40
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Ken Norton, 18:33
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, NSURIT, 18:30
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Philippe Amard, 18:28
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Ken Norton, 18:28
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Candace Lemarr, 18:26
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Michael Collins, 18:21
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 18:17
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Chuck Norcutt, 18:11
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, NSURIT, 18:10
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Candace Lemarr, 18:06
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 18:05
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 17:48
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 17:47
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 17:44
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, AS, 17:43
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, AS, 17:42
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Michael Wong, 17:41
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Michael Wong, 17:40
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, John Hermanson, 17:32
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Wiliam Wagenaar, 17:14
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Charles Geilfuss, 16:53
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., NSURIT, 16:52
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 16:48
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Chuck Norcutt, 16:45
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, NSURIT, 16:41
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, NSURIT, 16:35
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Russ Butler, 16:27
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Ken Norton, 16:18
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Ken Norton, 16:03
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Joel Wilcox, 15:59
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Charles Geilfuss, 15:22
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 15:16
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Chuck Norcutt, 15:10
Re: [OM] A new born baby, John Hermanson, 14:45
Re: [OM] Silkypix Developer Studio 2.0, Chris Barker, 14:45
Re: [OM] Silkypix Developer Studio 2.0, Ian Nichols, 14:45
Re: [OM] Silkypix Developer Studio 2.0, C.H.Ling, 14:44
Re: [OM] Silkypix Developer Studio 2.0, Chris Barker, 14:43
[OM] Color mixer for digital imaging, Charlie Horse Dancer, 14:36
[OM] Silkypix Developer Studio 2.0, Charlie Horse Dancer, 14:31
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Philippe Amard, 14:20
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Charles Geilfuss, 14:14
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Bob Whitmire, 14:04
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Donald, 14:03
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Chris Barker, 13:59
Re: [OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Charles Geilfuss, 13:55
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Chris Barker, 13:44
Re: [OM] A new born baby, C.H.Ling, 13:30
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chris Barker, 13:00
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Chuck Norcutt, 12:58
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Chuck Norcutt, 12:19
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:05
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, iwert bernakiewicz, 11:47
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, iwert bernakiewicz, 11:46
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Chuck Norcutt, 11:45
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Richard Man, 11:21
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 11:11
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Michael Wong, 11:08
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 11:03
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Ian Nichols, 10:38
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Wayne Harridge, 09:39
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, priit, 09:38
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, khen lim, 08:54
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Richard Man, 08:49
Re: [OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], khen lim, 08:48
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Richard Man, 08:47
Re: [OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, khen lim, 08:40
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Robert Burnette, 08:06
Re: [OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 07:49
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 40: sunny Spain and rainy Belgium, Nathan Wajsman, 07:06
Re: [OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, khen lim, 06:23
[OM] What are wordings to identify own family & all families of brother & sister? [Was: A new born baby], Michael Wong, 05:03
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 04:54
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 04:51
Re: [OM] A new born baby, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:50
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 04:49
[OM] Chuck's gettin' better, usher99, 04:45
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 04:44
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 04:40
Re: [OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Chuck Norcutt, 04:38
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 04:35
Re: [OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Chuck Norcutt, 04:27
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 04:24
Re: [OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Ken Norton, 04:21
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Russ Butler, 04:14
Re: [OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Sue Pearce, 03:53
Re: [OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Jim Nichols, 03:52
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:15
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:49
[OM] Chuck's gettin' better, Chuck Norcutt, 02:40
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 02:29
Re: [OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Chuck Norcutt, 02:27
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:25
[OM] Velvia Mood, usher99, 02:12
[OM] OM 4T SOLD!, NSURIT, 01:45
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., NSURIT, 01:26
[OM] CF card read speeds [was No E-System pro camera until 2010 ; ( - Now xD vs CF], Moose, 01:25
Re: [OM] A new born baby, NSURIT, 01:21

October 15, 2009

Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 23:36
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Moose, 23:04
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 22:32
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Moose, 22:28
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Moose, 22:10
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Ken Norton, 21:53
[OM] Here you go, E-5 Viewfinder, Richard Man, 21:52
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Frank van Lindert, 21:49
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Chuck Norcutt, 21:49
Re: [OM] A new born baby, AS, 21:43
Re: [OM] A new born baby, FXCM, 21:35
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 21:30
Re: [OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 21:23
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Philippe Amard, 21:18
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Donald, 21:04
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Jim Nichols, 20:42
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 20:38
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 20:37
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 20:32
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 20:29
Re: [OM] A new born baby, khen lim, 20:28
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 20:25
[OM] The antz in my pantz are pretty much gone now...thank you, khen lim, 20:24
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Philippe Amard, 20:18
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Jim Nichols, 20:18
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Charles Geilfuss, 20:17
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 20:12
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 20:11
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 20:04
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Joel Wilcox, 19:56
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 19:42
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 19:41
Re: [OM] [SPAM] Re: FS Oly and other items, Jim Nichols, 19:37
Re: [OM] A new born baby, Charles Geilfuss, 19:28
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jim Couch, 19:27
Re: [OM] An impressive shot, Jim Nichols, 19:19
[OM] A new born baby, Michael Wong, 19:02
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Charles Geilfuss, 19:00
[OM] An impressive shot, Michael Wong, 18:54
Re: [OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., Ken Norton, 18:10
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., NSURIT, 18:07
Re: [OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., Chuck Norcutt, 18:01
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Donald, 18:00
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 17:53
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Ken Norton, 17:50
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 17:46
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 17:45
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Chuck Norcutt, 17:43
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 17:31
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, John Hermanson, 16:41
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Ken Norton, 16:04
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Ken Norton, 16:01
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ken Norton, 15:57
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Bob Whitmire, 14:57
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Bob Whitmire, 14:55
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Bob Whitmire, 14:44
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Bob Whitmire, 14:42
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Ian Nichols, 14:27
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, iwert bernakiewicz, 14:22
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, Dawid Loubser, 12:19
Re: [OM] [SPAM] Re: FS Oly and other items, Andrew Fildes, 11:26
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Chris Barker, 11:12
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, iwert bernakiewicz, 10:54
Re: [OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., Moose, 10:53
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Chris Barker, 09:56
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chris Barker, 09:18
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, Bart Wientjes, 08:37
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Chris Barker, 07:54
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jim Nichols, 07:45
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Moose, 07:40
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Chris Barker, 07:37
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Philippe Amard, 07:31
Re: [OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., Chris Barker, 07:30
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Moose, 07:27
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Philippe Amard, 07:26
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Chris Barker, 07:04
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 06:05
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 05:17
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 05:15
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, Chris Crawford, 05:14
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 05:09
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Chuck Norcutt, 05:05
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Chuck Norcutt, 05:03
Re: [OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:30
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:29
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, NSURIT, 04:17
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, Ken Norton, 04:09
Re: [OM] FS - OM 4T, Chris Crawford, 04:08
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Joel Wilcox, 04:07
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/Vhell...], C.H.Ling, 04:04
[OM] All this talk about Zuikos and full-frame..., Ken Norton, 04:01
[OM] FS - OM 4T, NSURIT, 03:49
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:46
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:34
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, AS, 03:21
Re: [OM] film scanning [was I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell...], C.H.Ling, 03:08
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ken Norton, 02:56
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, C.H.Ling, 02:47
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Daniel Sepke, 02:45
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., C.H.Ling, 02:29
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Moose, 02:10
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Jim Couch, 01:51
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Tom Fenwick, 01:17
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jim Nichols, 00:40
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ken Norton, 00:37
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, JOHN DUGGAN, 00:33

October 14, 2009

Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Moose, 23:44
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Ken Norton, 23:31
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Moose, 23:24
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Jon Mitchell, 23:22
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Philippe Amard, 23:20
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Bob Whitmire, 23:13
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ken Norton, 23:13
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Bob Whitmire, 23:12
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:04
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Andrew Fildes, 22:52
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Jon Mitchell, 22:44
Re: [OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., Ken Norton, 22:19
[OM] Yes, I know that you know these things, however . . ., NSURIT, 21:54
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Ken Norton, 20:55
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., khen lim, 20:55
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 20:51
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 20:50
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., khen lim, 20:47
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., khen lim, 20:46
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 20:44
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 20:44
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., iwert bernakiewicz, 20:41
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Jim Couch, 20:41
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Chuck Norcutt, 20:30
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 20:27
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 20:25
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 20:23
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 20:22
Re: [OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., Paul Laughlin, 20:12
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Wiliam Wagenaar, 19:49
[OM] I have antz in my pantz with this A/V hell..., khen lim, 19:46
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Jim Nichols, 19:17
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now xD vs CF, Philippe Amard, 19:10
Re: [OM] FS Oly and other items, Jim Nichols, 18:11
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Philippe Amard, 18:08
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Jim Couch, 18:04
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Jim Nichols, 17:52
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jim Nichols, 17:42
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Jim Nichols, 17:40
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Chris Barker, 17:08
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Ken Norton, 17:02
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Ken Norton, 16:47
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 16:26
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, Michael Collins, 16:08
[OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;( - Now Raw & Jpeg, NSURIT, 15:55
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, C.H.Ling, 15:54
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Ken Norton, 15:51
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 15:50
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ken Norton, 15:44
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Ken Norton, 15:42
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, C.H.Ling, 15:26
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, JOHN DUGGAN, 15:14
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 15:08
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 15:05
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 14:56
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Andrew Fildes, 14:39
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Andrew Fildes, 14:16
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 14:07
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Chris Barker, 14:02
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Andrew Fildes, 13:46
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Philippe Amard, 13:18
Re: [OM] IMG: From Water to Water, and the Deep Blue California Sky, Wayne Harridge, 13:14
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Chris Barker, 12:59
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Chris Barker, 12:57
[OM] IMG: From Water to Water, and the Deep Blue California Sky, Richard Man, 12:17
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, C.H.Ling, 12:13
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Angel Lobo, 10:54
[OM] FS Oly and other items, Andrew Fildes, 09:26
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 04:55
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Sue Pearce, 04:01
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Russ Butler, 02:00
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 01:47
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Ian Manners, 01:29
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, usher99, 01:20
[OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], usher99, 01:01
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 00:57
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 00:52
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 00:51
[OM] Paging David D Miller ..., Jon Mitchell, 00:14
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, David Irisarri Vila, 00:00

October 13, 2009

Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Andrew Fildes, 23:56
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:51
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Sue Pearce, 23:45
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 23:34
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, David Irisarri Vila, 23:31
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Michael Collins, 23:15
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 23:12
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 23:02
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 22:56
Re: [OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Bob Whitmire, 22:30
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Bob Whitmire, 22:23
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 22:20
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Moose, 22:16
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Moose, 22:00
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Moose, 21:58
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:51
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 21:47
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Sue Pearce, 21:46
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:44
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Chuck Norcutt, 21:43
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Philippe Amard, 21:42
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Jim Couch, 21:41
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, khen lim, 21:40
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:36
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:32
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Philippe Amard, 21:27
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:25
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, khen lim, 21:23
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, khen lim, 21:19
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Richard Man, 21:15
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 21:13
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Sue Pearce, 20:56
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Richard Man, 20:49
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, khen lim, 20:40
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, khen lim, 20:36
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 20:30
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, NSURIT, 20:24
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Clay Nichols, 20:15
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Charles Geilfuss, 20:05
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Charles Geilfuss, 20:03
[OM] Nathan's PAD 13/10/2009: Breaking the waves, Nathan Wajsman, 19:55
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Joel Wilcox, 18:40
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Ken Norton, 18:39
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 18:37
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Russ Butler, 18:35
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, David Irisarri Vila, 18:19
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 18:10
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 18:04
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 18:01
Re: [OM] Catching chippy, Jim Nichols, 18:00
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Ken Norton, 17:56
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Joel Wilcox, 17:54
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Jim Nichols, 17:52
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Russ Butler, 17:50
Re: [OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, Chuck Norcutt, 17:47
Re: [OM] Catching chippy, Charles Geilfuss, 17:27
[OM] No E-System pro camera until 2010 ;(, David Irisarri Vila, 17:24
Re: [OM] Gettin' chippy [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who, , is Training Who?]], Mike Lazzari, 17:06
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, NSURIT, 17:01
[OM] Catching chippy, Russ Butler, 16:53
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Sue Pearce, 16:50
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, John Hermanson, 16:27
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Chuck Norcutt, 16:25
Re: [OM] Re-Greetings, Charles Geilfuss, 16:17
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 16:15
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Ken Norton, 15:45
Re: [OM] The incredible shrinking man, Ralf Loi, 15:39
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Bart Wientjes, 15:37
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Daniel Sepke, 15:35
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Daniel Sepke, 15:32
Re: [OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, John Hermanson, 15:30
[OM] The incredible shrinking man, Chuck Norcutt, 14:47
[OM] Back to Olympus, back to digital, Michael Wong, 14:45
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, John Hermanson, 14:34
Re: [OM] Who is Training Who?, Joel Wilcox, 14:33
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Joel Wilcox, 14:17
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 14:11
Re: [OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Joel Wilcox, 14:10
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Rick Beckrich, 13:42
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Chuck Norcutt, 12:57
Re: [OM] Gettin' chippy [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who, is Training Who?]], Chuck Norcutt, 12:52
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Chuck Norcutt, 12:48
[OM] Hi, I'm Moose and I ... [was Parker 51], Moose, 11:43
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 11:21
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 11:20
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Piers Hemy, 11:02
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Bart Wientjes, 10:30
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, SwissPace, 10:26
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 09:43
Re: [OM] Re-Greetings, Chris Barker, 08:38
Re: [OM] E-620, JTimpe, 07:43
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Andrew Fildes, 07:28
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 07:05
Re: [OM] E-620, Jim Couch, 07:04
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Jim Couch, 06:53
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Jim Couch, 06:52
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Jim Couch, 06:51
Re: [OM] A new toy., Jim Couch, 06:45
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jim Couch, 06:42
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 06:36
[OM] not OM but photography related, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 06:24
Re: [OM] Gettin' chippy [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who, is Training Who?]], Moose, 05:59
Re: [OM] Gettin' chippy [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who, is Training Who?]], Jim Nichols, 05:20
Re: [OM] Gettin' chippy [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who, is Training Who?]], Mike Lazzari, 05:15
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 04:54
Re: [OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Chuck Norcutt, 04:29
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Jim Nichols, 04:14
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Jim Nichols, 04:03
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Chuck Norcutt, 02:57
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Chuck Norcutt, 02:44
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Russ Butler, 02:41
Re: [OM] Who is Training Who?, Chuck Norcutt, 02:39
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:19
[OM] [WTB] Lidicolset 66 set for Durst M370 Easy Color, Michael Wong, 01:57
Re: [OM] Knee operation, AS, 01:41
[OM] E-620, jtimpe, 01:23
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:43
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Chuck Norcutt, 00:30
Re: [OM] Re-Greetings, Moose, 00:11
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Michael Collins, 00:09
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Moose, 00:02
Re: [OM] Re-Greetings, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 00:01
Re: [OM] Re-Greetings, Ken Norton, 00:00

October 12, 2009

Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Moose, 23:56
[OM] Re-Greetings, Brent, 23:53
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 23:49
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Paul Laughlin, 23:48
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Jim Nichols, 23:41
[OM] Gettin' squirrelly [was Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?]], Moose, 23:36
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Ian Nichols, 23:36
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 23:32
[OM] Olympus OM Way L.A. Mannheim, andrew elliott, 23:17
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Jim Nichols, 23:16
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Sue Pearce, 23:05
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Jim Nichols, 23:01
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Andrew Fildes, 22:57
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Philippe Amard, 22:55
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Clay Nichols, 22:54
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Clay Nichols, 22:53
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 22:50
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Andrew Fildes, 22:40
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Andrew Fildes, 22:31
Re: [OM] Who is Training Who?, Andrew Fildes, 22:27
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Andrew Fildes, 22:24
Re: [OM] (O)M ) aging, Andrew Fildes, 22:21
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Andrew Fildes, 22:19
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Jim Nichols, 21:47
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, usher99, 21:44
Re: [OM] Coumadin story, Wiliam Wagenaar, 21:43
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Jim Nichols, 21:36
[OM] Coumadin story, Sue Pearce, 21:10
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Clay Nichols, 21:00
Re: [OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Clay Nichols, 20:55
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 20:51
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Ken Norton, 20:51
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Moose, 20:48
[OM] Who is Training Whom? [was Who is Training Who?], Moose, 20:46
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Moose, 20:40
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Moose, 20:38
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 20:30
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Mike Lazzari, 20:20
Re: [OM] A new toy., Moose, 20:14
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 20:08
Re: [OM] Funny comic, Chris Barker, 20:06
Re: [OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 19:59
Re: [OM] Who is Training Who?, Jim Nichols, 19:47
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 19:44
Re: [OM] Who is Training Who?, Chris Barker, 19:42
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 19:16
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 19:13
[OM] Who is Training Who?, Jim Nichols, 19:08
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 12/10/2009: self-portrait, Chris Barker, 19:06
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 18:59
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 18:44
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Clay Nichols, 18:35
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, JOHN DUGGAN, 18:16
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 17:42
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Clay Nichols, 17:19
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 16:22
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, John Hermanson, 16:10
Re: [OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 16:09
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, John Hermanson, 16:08
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 15:49
Re: [OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, John Hermanson, 15:36
Re: [OM] A new toy., Russ Butler, 15:27
Re: [OM] Pinniped Gallery, Dawid Loubser, 15:26
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Piers Hemy, 15:01
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Piers Hemy, 15:00
[OM] (O)M ) aging, Brian Swale, 14:58
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Piers Hemy, 14:52
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Brian Swale, 14:43
[OM] 357 batteries, Brian Gray, 13:40
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Carlos J. Santisteban, 13:18
[OM] Lighttable, was: Return of the bionic man, Carlos J. Santisteban, 13:15
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Carlos J. Santisteban, 13:08
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Carlos J. Santisteban, 13:02
[OM] Pinniped Gallery, Jim Loudon, 13:01
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:59
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 12/10/2009: self-portrait, Donald, 12:47
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 12/10/2009: self-portrait, Chuck Norcutt, 12:40
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chuck Norcutt, 12:34
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, iwert bernakiewicz, 10:54
[OM] Nathan's PAD 12/10/2009: self-portrait, Nathan Wajsman, 10:38
[OM] Experimental Memory based image sensor, Tim Hughes, 09:58
Re: [OM] Funny comic, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 09:03
[OM] Funny comic, Chris Crawford, 08:37
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Andrew Fildes, 08:34
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, khen lim, 08:27
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Clay Nichols, 07:58
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Ken Norton, 07:52
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Clay Nichols, 07:51
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Ken Norton, 07:50
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 07:39
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Andrew Fildes, 07:37
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 07:36
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 07:35
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Chris Barker, 07:34
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Andrew Fildes, 07:33
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Chris Barker, 07:32
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Andrew Fildes, 07:24
Re: [OM] Lens adapters, was: New affordable Sony FF, Tim Hughes, 07:21
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Chris Barker, 07:17
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Nathan Wajsman, 07:11
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, khen lim, 07:07
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Moose, 06:39
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Jim Nichols, 05:44
Re: [OM] 20mm f/3.5 Macro (non-MC), Chuck Norcutt, 05:40
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 05:33
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Chuck Norcutt, 05:13
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Marc Lawrence, 02:58
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:51
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Clay Nichols, 02:48
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Donald, 02:34
Re: [OM] 20mm f/3.5 Macro (non-MC), Tim Hughes, 02:18
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Jim Nichols, 01:44
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Ken Norton, 00:32
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Ken Norton, 00:27
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Joel Wilcox, 00:19
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:18
[OM] 357 batteries, usher99, 00:16
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:09
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!-now Chuck's knee, usher99, 00:02

October 11, 2009

Re: [OM] Knee operation, Ken Norton, 23:57
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 23:50
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:42
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Wiliam Wagenaar, 23:40
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Ken Norton, 23:31
Re: [OM] Knee operation, Chuck Norcutt, 23:25
[OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], usher99, 23:24
Re: [OM] Knee operation (was: IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!), Wiliam Wagenaar, 23:18
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 23:18
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 23:17
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chuck Norcutt, 23:13
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:08
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Andrew Fildes, 23:04
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 22:42
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 22:29
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 22:28
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Ken Norton, 22:11
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 21:37
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Michael Collins, 21:35
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Bob Whitmire, 21:27
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Ken Norton, 21:26
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Philippe Amard, 21:24
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Philippe Amard, 21:22
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Ken Norton, 21:21
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Ken Norton, 21:17
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Ken Norton, 21:14
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 21:02
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 20:15
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Chris Barker, 20:07
Re: [OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 20:05
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 19:43
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 19:00
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 18:24
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Jim Nichols, 18:16
Re: [OM] A new toy., Chuck Norcutt, 18:02
[OM] Nathan's PAD 11/10/2009: from my morning ride, Nathan Wajsman, 16:27
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Chuck Norcutt, 15:22
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 14:43
Re: [OM] 20mm f/3.5 Macro (non-MC), Carlos J. Santisteban, 13:37
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, philippe.amard, 13:10
[OM] (OM) Re Chuck's knee operatioin, Brian Swale, 12:54
[OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Frank Wijsmuller, 11:54
[OM] Speedy recovery - was RE: IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Jeff Keller, 06:46
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Ken Norton, 05:10
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Moose, 04:16
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Tim Hughes, 04:15
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Chuck Norcutt, 04:12
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Chuck Norcutt, 03:58
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, usher99, 03:47
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:45
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, usher99, 03:42
Re: [OM] A new toy., Chris Crawford, 03:17
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Tim Hughes, 02:33
[OM] A new toy., Moose, 02:30
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Tim Hughes, 02:23
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 02:05
Re: [OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Charlie Horse Dancer, 01:51
[OM] NY & New England - 2009 [was OT: Nobel Prize], Moose, 01:46
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 01:21
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Jim Nichols, 01:19
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, David Bell, 00:56
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Scott Gomez, 00:50
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Andrew Fildes, 00:49
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Scott Gomez, 00:47
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chuck Norcutt, 00:38
Re: [OM] Cruelty Abounds, Andrew Fildes, 00:28

October 10, 2009

Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Andrew Fildes, 23:24
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 22:16
[OM] Cruelty Abounds, Ken Norton, 21:32
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 21:30
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Bob Whitmire, 21:27
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Bob Whitmire, 21:25
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 21:17
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 21:11
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Steve & Alicia Goss, 20:21
Re: [OM] This guy gets it, Ken Norton, 19:07
Re: [OM] This guy gets it, Jeff Keller, 18:41
[OM] This guy gets it, Ken Norton, 17:45
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 17:21
Re: [OM] Saturday Taiko, Ken Norton, 15:43
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Ian Manners, 15:32
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 14:50
[OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, Brian Swale, 13:02
Re: [OM] Saturday Taiko, Chris Barker, 11:20
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Chris Barker, 11:15
Re: [OM] Saturday Taiko, Richard Man, 10:40
Re: [OM] Saturday Taiko, Wiliam Wagenaar, 10:36
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Wiliam Wagenaar, 10:29
[OM] Saturday Taiko, Richard Man, 10:16
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Wayne Harridge, 08:39
[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 39: ¡A la bici!, Nathan Wajsman, 08:13
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Andrew Fildes, 07:14
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Ian Manners, 01:41
[OM] CA, usher99, 01:21
[OM] OT: Nobel Prize, usher99, 01:07
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 00:51

October 09, 2009

Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 23:15
Re: [OM] what kind of photographer are you, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 23:01
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Andrew Fildes, 22:44
Re: [OM] what kind of photographer are you, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 22:37
Re: [OM] Fetishes, was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Andrew Fildes, 22:31
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Michael Collins, 22:26
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Joel Wilcox, 22:23
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Willie Wonka, 22:17
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Michael Collins, 22:06
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Moose, 22:02
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 22:01
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Moose, 21:52
[OM] adjusting the 24 shift mechanism, iwert bernakiewicz, 21:16
Re: [OM] what kind of photographer are you, Ken Norton, 20:55
[OM] what kind of photographer are you, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 20:37
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Chris Barker, 19:09
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Charles Geilfuss, 18:58
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Chris Barker, 18:42
Re: [OM] ink was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 18:37
Re: [OM] ink was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 18:30
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 18:14
Re: [OM] Printer Update, Ken Norton, 18:07
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Clay Nichols, 18:04
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Michael Collins, 17:58
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Clay Nichols, 17:55
[OM] Printer Update, Willie Wonka, 17:33
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Philippe Amard, 17:25
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Philippe Amard, 17:23
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Philippe Amard, 17:21
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Ken Norton, 17:19
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Willie Wonka, 17:11
[OM] Olympus question from new member, Frank Wijsmuller, 17:02
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Ken Norton, 15:54
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Charles Geilfuss, 15:48
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Charles Geilfuss, 15:45
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Jim Couch, 15:24
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member E3 successor?, Jim Couch, 15:21
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Jim Couch, 15:13
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, JTimpe, 15:03
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Joel Wilcox, 14:29
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Martyn Smoothy, 14:21
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Brian Swale, 13:21
Re: [OM] Fetishes, was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Brian Swale, 13:16
Re: [OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Donald, 13:11
[OM] OT: Nobel Prize, Philippe Amard, 12:24
Re: [OM] [OT]Pigeons was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, David Bell, 11:53
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Andrew Fildes, 11:01
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Andrew Fildes, 10:58
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Philippe Amard, 09:58
[OM] fetishes, was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ian Manners, 09:57
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jez Cunningham, 09:48
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Wiliam Wagenaar, 09:47
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Philippe Amard, 09:46
Re: [OM] Olympus question from new member, Jez Cunningham, 09:42
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Wiliam Wagenaar, 09:37
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Chris Crawford, 09:32
[OM] Olympus question from new member, Philippe Amard, 09:26
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Andrew Fildes, 09:14
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Andrew Fildes, 08:14
Re: [OM] ink was Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 08:07
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Andrew Fildes, 08:06
Re: [OM] Irving Penn dies, Chris Barker, 07:35
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 07:28
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 07:27
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Joel Wilcox, 05:56
Re: [OM] Irving Penn dies, Clay Nichols, 04:39
[OM] Irving Penn dies, usher99, 01:07
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, JOHN DUGGAN, 00:16
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Wayne Harridge, 00:01

October 08, 2009

Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Donald, 22:43
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 22:21
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 22:19
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 22:16
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Nathan Wajsman, 21:55
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 21:51
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 21:51
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Charles Geilfuss, 21:05
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, AS, 20:55
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 20:41
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Donald, 20:20
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Donald, 20:18
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Nathan Wajsman, 20:16
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 19:49
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 19:48
Re: [OM] OT Succoth Holiday, Mike Lazzari, 19:41
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 19:24
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 19:21
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Mike Lazzari, 19:15
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 18:08
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 18:07
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 18:00
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jez Cunningham, 17:59
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 17:57
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, David Bell, 17:48
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ralf Loi, 17:18
Re: [OM] [OT] Adventures in Cell Phones, AS, 17:17
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 16:35
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 16:34
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Jim Couch, 15:51
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Jim Couch, 15:45
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 15:42
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Jim Couch, 15:41
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, David Bell, 15:40
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Jim Couch, 15:37
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Jim Couch, 15:21
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, John Hermanson, 15:06
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, John Hermanson, 15:00
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Charles Geilfuss, 14:59
Re: [OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 14:55
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Charles Geilfuss, 14:54
Re: [OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, John Hermanson, 14:49
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 14:47
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 14:41
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, John Hermanson, 14:36
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Donald, 14:12
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Jez Cunningham, 14:02
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Daniel Sepke, 13:49
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Chris Barker, 13:24
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Chris Barker, 13:23
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Chris Barker, 13:22
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Chris Barker, 13:17
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Chris Barker, 13:12
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Chris Barker, 13:11
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Chris Barker, 13:10
[OM] Parker 51, was Adventures in Cell Phones, Chris Barker, 12:54
Re: [OM] E-620 is here - more impressions - warning: a lot of em - long post!, Jim Couch, 06:06
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Wayne Harridge, 05:08
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Wayne Harridge, 05:08
Re: [OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, Wayne Harridge, 04:57
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 04:56
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Jim Couch, 04:45
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Scott Gomez, 02:23
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Martyn Smoothy, 00:27
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, David Bell, 00:15

October 07, 2009

Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Frank van Lindert, 22:18
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Stephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:46
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Bob Whitmire, 21:46
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, iwert bernakiewicz, 21:44
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Bob Whitmire, 21:43
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, David Bell, 21:32
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Frank van Lindert, 21:28
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Nathan Wajsman, 21:25
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, jez . cunningham, 21:18
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Michael Collins, 21:17
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, David Bell, 21:12
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Stephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:03
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Nathan Wajsman, 20:52
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Frank van Lindert, 20:23
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Frank van Lindert, 20:12
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Chris Barker, 20:11
Re: [OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Chris Barker, 20:08
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Chris Barker, 20:05
[OM] (OT) Found on the Internet, Bob Whitmire, 19:45
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, DrT (George Themelis), 18:44
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Russ Butler, 18:34
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, Rick Beckrich, 18:12
Re: [OM] OT ebay searches, John Hermanson, 18:08
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Chris Barker, 18:00
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 17:49
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Mike Lazzari, 17:33
Re: [OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, Jez Cunningham, 17:17
Re: [OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, DrT (George Themelis), 17:15
Re: [OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, Jez Cunningham, 17:10
[OM] OT: Digital 3d meeting in Ohio last night, DrT (George Themelis), 17:08
Re: [OM] Still alive, Ralf Loi, 16:54
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Ralf Loi, 16:43
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Donald, 16:36
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Charles Geilfuss, 16:31
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Jez Cunningham, 16:12
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 15:51
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, iwert bernakiewicz, 15:49
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, AS, 15:39
Re: [OM] Antwerp CS delay, Jez Cunningham, 15:37
[OM] Antwerp CS delay, iwert bernakiewicz, 15:13
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Charles Geilfuss, 14:55
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 14:43
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 14:37
[OM] ( OM ) OT Succoth Holiday, Brian Swale, 13:42
[OM] (OM) Return of the Bionic Man, Brian Swale, 12:03
[OM] Jason Gidden/SYSTEMS/LONDON/BFI/BNP is out of the office., jason . gidden, 11:42
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Brian Swale, 11:32
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Jez Cunningham, 09:47
Re: [OM] Come on down..., Jez Cunningham, 09:41
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Jim Couch, 06:45
[OM] Simple fill-in: wear a white shirt with long sleeves, tOM Trottier, 06:31
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Willie Wonka, 06:29
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 05:53
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 05:49
Re: [OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Scott Gomez, 05:21
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 03:56
Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Succoth Holiday, Moose, 03:51
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 00:49

October 06, 2009

[OM] Return of the bionic man, usher99, 23:39
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 22:19
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Barry Bean, 20:39
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Charles Geilfuss, 20:34
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, NSURIT, 19:37
Re: [OM] Lenses, NSURIT, 19:35
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Jeff Keller, 19:29
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Ken Norton, 18:53
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Jeff Keller, 18:46
[OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, usher99, 18:44
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Jeff Keller, 18:43
Re: [OM] Lenses, John Hermanson, 18:23
Re: [OM] Han Restaurant Exhibit, Bay Area, Jeff Keller, 17:31
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 17:08
[OM] Another list thank you, Ken Norton, 16:25
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 16:15
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, John Hermanson, 16:15
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Piers Hemy, 16:14
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:13
Re: [OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, Piers Hemy, 16:11
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:08
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:08
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Don Holbrook, 16:08
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:06
Re: [OM] Come on down..., Nathan Wajsman, 16:01
[OM] Adventures in Cell Phones, Ken Norton, 16:00
Re: [OM] Come on down..., Piers Hemy, 15:57
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 15:54
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 15:49
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 15:27
[OM] IMG: Oktoberfest 2009, Nathan Wajsman, 15:16
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, AS, 15:03
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 14:43
Re: [OM] ( OM ) OT Succoth Holiday, Nathan Wajsman, 14:32
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 14:31
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 14:23
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Russ Butler, 14:22
[OM] ( OM ) OT Succoth Holiday, Brian Swale, 14:21
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Jez Cunningham, 13:28
[OM] Nathan's PAD 05/10/2009: Brussels autumn weather, Nathan Wajsman, 13:07
Re: [OM] Come on down..., Andrew Fildes, 12:40
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Piers Hemy, 12:32
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Piers Hemy, 12:30
Re: [OM] 357 batteries from UK, Wayne Harridge, 11:46
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Chuck Norcutt, 11:24
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Donald, 10:47
Re: [OM] Come on down..., Piers Hemy, 10:46
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, C.H.Ling, 10:41
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Donald, 10:40
Re: [OM] 357 batteries from UK, Jez Cunningham, 10:29
Re: [OM] OT -- Panny LX3, Chris Barker, 09:28
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), Jez Cunningham, 09:21
Re: [OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, iwert bernakiewicz, 08:38
[OM] Come on down..., Andrew Fildes, 08:17
Re: [OM] OT -- Panny LX3, Andrew Fildes, 08:11
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 07:53
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Chris Barker, 07:48
Re: [OM] OT -- Panny LX3, Chris Barker, 07:47
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 07:44
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Chris Barker, 07:43
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Chris Barker, 07:42
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Chris Barker, 07:41
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 07:32
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 07:20
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Andrew Fildes, 07:13
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Mike Lazzari, 07:01
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Mike Lazzari, 06:59
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Moose, 06:15
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, JTimpe, 06:01
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 05:37
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 05:22
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Moose, 05:13
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Wayne Harridge, 04:58
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Wayne Harridge, 04:56
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Bob Docherty, 04:37
Re: [OM] Return of the bionic man, Jim Couch, 04:35
[OM] Return of the bionic man, Chuck Norcutt, 04:30
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, NSURIT, 02:56
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 00:38
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Chuck Norcutt, 00:00

October 05, 2009

Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Chuck Norcutt, 23:57
[OM] OM mount sony?, Sue Pearce, 23:39
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señorita, Ken Norton, 23:34
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 23:32
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Chuck Norcutt, 23:30
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señorita, Sue Pearce, 23:25
[OM] OM to Sony alpha adapter-- f/u, usher99, 23:21
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Chuck Norcutt, 23:10
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Ken Norton, 23:03
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Donald, 23:00
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Charles Geilfuss, 22:49
Re: [OM] Leica X1, Andrew Fildes, 22:46
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 22:43
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, iwert bernakiewicz, 22:34
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 22:31
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Ian Nichols, 22:23
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Sue Pearce, 21:40
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Chuck Norcutt, 21:28
Re: [OM] Leica X1, Chuck Norcutt, 21:27
Re: [OM] OT -- Panny LX3, Chuck Norcutt, 21:25
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Philippe Amard, 21:17
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Philippe Amard, 21:13
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), Ken Norton, 21:09
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 21:07
Re: [OM] Leica X1, Ken Norton, 20:48
Re: [OM] [OT] National Parks online, Charles Geilfuss, 20:45
Re: [OM] Leica X1, Sue Pearce, 20:32
Re: [OM] IMG: Tired & Hungry, Jim Nichols, 19:52
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Chris Barker, 19:47
[OM] Leica X1, Jez Cunningham, 19:45
[OM] OT -- Panny LX3, Chris Barker, 19:45
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Chris Barker, 19:40
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), Jez Cunningham, 19:33
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, NSURIT, 19:31
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 19:24
Re: [OM] IMG: Tired & Hungry, Chris Barker, 19:13
Re: [OM] 80/4 macro vs. the world., Chuck Norcutt, 18:52
Re: [OM] 80/4 macro vs. the world., Ken Norton, 18:38
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), Ken Norton, 18:35
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Chuck Norcutt, 18:25
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Chuck Norcutt, 18:19
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 17:54
Re: [OM] IMG: Tired & Hungry, Jim Nichols, 17:49
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), DrT (George Themelis), 17:37
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Ken Norton, 17:32
Re: [OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), Charles Geilfuss, 17:27
[OM] DrT's news (Mil-spec(?) Olympus), DrT (George Themelis), 17:24
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 17:21
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Charles Geilfuss, 17:19
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., John Hermanson, 17:17
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Charles Geilfuss, 17:14
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Ken Norton, 17:12
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, Don Holbrook, 17:10
Re: [OM] Mil-spec(?) Olympus, Ken Norton, 17:07
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 16:59
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 16:55
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, John Hermanson, 16:52
[OM] [OT] National Parks online, Frank Wijsmuller, 16:48
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:48
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Ian Nichols, 16:28
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Donald, 16:20
Re: [OM] 80/4 macro vs. the world., Dawid Loubser, 16:18
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Moose, 16:12
Re: [OM] Mil-spec(?) Olympus, DrT (George Themelis), 15:57
Re: [OM] [OT] National Parks online, Ken Norton, 15:40
Re: [OM] Mil-spec(?) Olympus, Ken Norton, 15:37
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 15:28
Re: [OM] Oly 80/4 macro, Sawyer, Edward, 15:25
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Russ Butler, 15:20
Re: [OM] 80/4 macro vs. the world., Sawyer, Edward, 15:10
Re: [OM] Mil-spec(?) Olympus, NSURIT, 15:06
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Ian Nichols, 14:59
[OM] Mil-spec(?) Olympus, Jim Loudon, 14:47
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., John Hermanson, 14:42
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Chuck Norcutt, 14:38
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Chuck Norcutt, 14:34
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Ian Manners, 14:13
Re: [OM] IMG: Tired & Hungry, Chuck Norcutt, 14:12
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Chuck Norcutt, 14:09
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Brian Swale, 13:31
[OM] ( OM ) Macro, Brian Swale, 13:22
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 12:54
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Dawid Loubser, 12:35
Re: [OM] You know you have been shooting for too long..., Dawid Loubser, 12:22
[OM] You know you have been shooting for too long..., Richard Man, 10:49
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Andrew Fildes, 10:43
[OM] Han Restaurant Exhibit, Bay Area, Richard Man, 09:55
Re: [OM] [OT] National Parks online, Jez Cunningham, 09:25
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Jez Cunningham, 09:15
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Philippe Amard, 09:06
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Andrew Fildes, 09:03
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Chris Barker, 07:34
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 07:16
Re: [OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., NSURIT, 06:38
[OM] [OT] Yet another printer tread..., Willie Wonka, 05:50
Re: [OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Jim Nichols, 05:08
Re: [OM] This is it, Ken Norton, 04:27
Re: [OM] This is it, Sue Pearce, 04:24
Re: [OM] This is it, Ken Norton, 04:15
[OM] [OT] National Parks online, AS, 03:42
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Moose, 03:19
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Moose, 03:18
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Joel Wilcox, 03:17
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Joel Wilcox, 02:59
Re: [OM] Ranata Batteries, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 02:45
[OM] IMG: Tired & Hungry, Jim Nichols, 02:39
[OM] Ranata Batteries, NSURIT, 02:25
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Ken Norton, 02:18
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 01:37
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 01:22
[OM] New Photos - taken with an actual OM-4 and in Black & White., Ian Nichols, 00:18
[OM] 357 batteries, usher99, 00:11

October 04, 2009

Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Sue Pearce, 23:37
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Sue Pearce, 23:35
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Chuck Norcutt, 23:20
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 23:18
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 23:10
[OM] Lens adapters, was: New affordable Sony FF, Carlos J. Santisteban, 23:09
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 23:02
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 22:58
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 22:50
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Bob Whitmire, 22:46
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Bob Whitmire, 22:43
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Chris Crawford, 22:30
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Nathan Wajsman, 22:11
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, AS, 21:42
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood- good job and feeling, Philippe Amard, 21:29
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Chuck Norcutt, 21:26
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, NSURIT, 21:20
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 21:18
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 21:16
Re: [OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, AS, 21:02
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Philippe Amard, 20:49
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Philippe Amard, 20:48
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 20:46
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 20:41
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 20:19
[OM] Pentamirror vs. pentaprism, Chuck Norcutt, 20:11
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 20:04
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 19:25
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 19:19
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 19:17
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Donald, 18:49
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, C.H.Ling, 18:16
Re: [OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 18:02
[OM] Waterfalls, was Velvia Mood, Chris Barker, 17:49
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Bob Docherty, 17:28
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Chuck Norcutt, 17:08
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 16:56
Re: [OM] Moon and Cloud, Ken Norton, 16:51
Re: [OM] This is it, Ken Norton, 16:48
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Chuck Norcutt, 16:47
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Moose, 16:36
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Moose, 16:25
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Dawid Loubser, 16:19
Re: [OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Dawid Loubser, 16:05
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 15:59
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Chuck Norcutt, 15:41
Re: [OM] This is it, Chris Barker, 15:40
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Chuck Norcutt, 15:16
Re: [OM] This is it, NSURIT, 15:12
Re: [OM] 357 batteries, Jez Cunningham, 14:06
Re: [OM] [OT] Diesel Jeep, was: Re: Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 13:22
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señorita, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:45
[OM] Diopter lenses, was: once again, digital vs film, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:39
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:33
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:30
Re: [OM] [OT] Diesel Jeep, was: Re: Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:26
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/09/2009: driving home from work, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:22
Re: [OM] Velvia Mood, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:17
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:11
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 38: autumn begins for real, Carlos J. Santisteban, 12:01
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 26/09/2009: unsharp señorita with sharp object, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:48
Re: [OM] IMG: My sister makes pierogi, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:44
Re: [OM] Moon and Cloud, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:41
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAD 23/09/2009: stormy clouds, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:38
Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 37: Brighton, Carlos J. Santisteban, 11:34
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Andrew Fildes, 11:12
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., Chris Barker, 08:12
[OM] 357 batteries, Mike Lazzari, 06:24
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señorita, AS, 05:03
Re: [OM] This is it, Chuck Norcutt, 02:59
Re: [OM] This is it, Wayne Harridge, 02:57
[OM] This is it, Ken Norton, 02:16
Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señor ita, Chuck Norcutt, 01:04
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., Chuck Norcutt, 01:01

October 03, 2009

Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señor ita, Ws, 23:42
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., David Bell, 22:26
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Stephan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:37
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Richard Man, 21:34
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Bob Whitmire, 20:33
[OM] Nathan's PAD 03/10/2009: Saturday señorita, Nathan Wajsman, 17:21
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Jez Cunningham, 16:17
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 16:10
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Ken Norton, 16:00
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Frank Wijsmuller, 15:32
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Chuck Norcutt, 15:12
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Andrew Fildes, 14:53
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 14:47
Re: [OM] Subject: Re: Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ws, 14:19
Re: [OM] Olyflex, Chuck Norcutt, 13:41
[OM] Olyflex, Andrew Fildes, 13:31
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 13:26
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., Chris Barker, 13:02
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:08
[OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Frank Wijsmuller, 11:49
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., Chris Barker, 11:00
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, iwert bernakiewicz, 10:04
Re: [OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Jeff Keller, 10:00
[OM] WTB: 200mm f5, Frank Wijsmuller, 09:41
[OM] WTB: 200mm f5, iwert bernakiewicz, 08:59
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 08:58
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Nathan Wajsman, 06:45
Re: [OM] National Parks, Moose, 04:52
Re: [OM] Subject: Re: Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 04:00
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Ken Norton, 03:41
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Joel Wilcox, 03:08
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Ken Norton, 03:04
[OM] Subject: Re: Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Willie Wonka, 03:01
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Andrew Fildes, 02:53
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Bob Whitmire, 02:44
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Chuck Norcutt, 02:28
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Andrew Fildes, 01:50
Re: [OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., Andrew Fildes, 01:48
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ws, 01:32
[OM] London Met Police guidelines on Photography., David Bell, 01:27
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Andrew Fildes, 00:56
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Andrew Fildes, 00:53

October 02, 2009

Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Joel Wilcox, 23:52
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Joel Wilcox, 21:37
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, John Hermanson, 19:58
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Chuck Norcutt, 19:57
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Jim Nichols, 19:34
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Chuck Norcutt, 19:10
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Chuck Norcutt, 19:04
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., iwert bernakiewicz, 18:24
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Jim Nichols, 18:13
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Ken Norton, 18:12
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 18:06
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Dawid Loubser, 18:06
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Dawid Loubser, 18:02
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 18:01
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 17:52
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 17:51
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Bob Whitmire, 17:32
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., NSURIT, 17:16
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., NSURIT, 17:13
Re: [OM] macro test data, Cobras, et al., Ken Norton, 16:16
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 16:04
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Ken Norton, 15:57
Re: [OM] macro test data, Cobras, et al., Clay Nichols, 15:48
Re: [OM] National Parks, AS, 15:35
Re: [OM] National Parks, John Hermanson, 15:30
Re: [OM] National Parks, John Hermanson, 15:29
Re: [OM] 80 macro, etc., Sawyer, Edward, 15:27
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Joel Wilcox, 15:27
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 15:26
Re: [OM] macro test data, Cobras, et al., Sawyer, Edward, 15:08
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, John Hermanson, 15:03
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., John Hermanson, 15:00
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., John Hermanson, 14:55
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., iwert bernakiewicz, 14:55
Re: [OM] National Parks, Jez Cunningham, 14:55
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Clay Nichols, 14:50
Re: [OM] National Parks, Clay Nichols, 14:47
Re: [OM] National Parks, Jez Cunningham, 14:33
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Joel Wilcox, 14:18
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Stephen Troy, 14:13
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 14:09
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ws, 14:04
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 14:00
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 13:33
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chuck Norcutt, 13:26
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 13:07
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Chuck Norcutt, 12:59
Re: [OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, iwert bernakiewicz, 12:55
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chris Barker, 09:28
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chris Barker, 09:23
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 09:22
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 09:18
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 09:14
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, C.H.Ling, 07:54
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Wayne Harridge, 07:44
[OM] OM] Because I Was There, Photographing At Yosemite, Willie Wonka, 07:43
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 07:40
Re: [OM] National Parks, Willie Wonka, 07:32
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Wayne Harridge, 07:28
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Willie Wonka, 07:23
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chris Barker, 07:22
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Ken Norton, 07:18
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Chris Barker, 07:15
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Richard Man, 06:48
Re: [OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Jim Nichols, 06:46
[OM] Raw conversion for Olympus files?, Jim Couch, 06:16
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Moose, 06:02
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Moose, 05:58
Re: [OM] National Parks, Moose, 05:52
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Moose, 05:33
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Moose, 05:30
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 05:01
Re: [OM] National Parks, Chuck Norcutt, 04:48
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Mike Lazzari, 04:45
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chuck Norcutt, 04:44
Re: [OM] National Parks, Ken Norton, 04:41
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Joel Wilcox, 04:34
[OM] National Parks, AS, 04:29
[OM] Because I Was There, Photographing At Yosemite, Richard Man, 03:54
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, C.H.Ling, 03:04
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Wayne Harridge, 02:57
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Scott Gomez, 02:51
[OM] Sharp? Who needs it?, Andrew Fildes, 02:45
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, C.H.Ling, 02:44
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 02:43
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, C.H.Ling, 02:39
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Andrew Fildes, 02:35
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Andrew Fildes, 02:34
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 02:32
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Andrew Fildes, 02:22
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Andrew Fildes, 02:07
[OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, usher99, 01:57
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 01:56
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Chuck Norcutt, 01:46
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Chuck Norcutt, 01:44
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Jeff Keller, 01:44
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chuck Norcutt, 01:39
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ws, 01:22

October 01, 2009

Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Ken Norton, 23:52
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 23:47
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 23:29
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Stephen Troy, 23:28
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Stephen Troy, 23:26
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., NSURIT, 23:21
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 22:44
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Donald, 22:32
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., NSURIT, 22:25
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Chuck Norcutt, 22:21
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 22:16
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 22:12
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Clay Nichols, 22:09
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Clay Nichols, 22:05
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Charles Geilfuss, 21:58
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 21:52
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Chris Barker, 21:43
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 21:42
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, Jon Mitchell, 21:15
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Jim Couch, 21:06
Re: [OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., Ken Norton, 21:00
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Charles Geilfuss, 20:47
Re: [OM] Trip to California, Johan Malmström, 20:44
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Johan Malmström, 20:43
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Johan Malmström, 20:36
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Johan Malmström, 20:34
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Johan Malmström, 20:33
Re: [OM] Trip to California, Johan Malmström, 20:32
[OM] Houston, the eagle has landed . . ., NSURIT, 20:31
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 20:25
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 20:23
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 20:22
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 20:21
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 20:19
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 20:15
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Joel Wilcox, 20:02
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 19:54
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Paul Laughlin, 19:44
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Clay Nichols, 19:21
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 19:18
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 19:15
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 19:14
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 19:10
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 19:09
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Charles Geilfuss, 19:01
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Charles Geilfuss, 18:58
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 18:56
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, JTimpe, 18:55
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Clay Nichols, 18:48
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 18:43
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Mike Lazzari, 18:39
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 18:20
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 18:18
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 18:11
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 17:40
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Ken Norton, 17:35
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, JTimpe, 17:34
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 17:30
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, JTimpe, 17:13
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, NSURIT, 16:22
Re: [OM] OM-3Ti, John Hermanson, 16:11
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, John Hermanson, 16:08
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 15:58
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 15:51
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 15:41
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 14:55
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 14:37
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 14:30
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Olaf Greve, 14:26
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Clay Nichols, 14:11
Re: [OM] OM4t Champagne Colour, Piers Hemy, 13:49
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Wayne Harridge, 13:34
Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Chuck Norcutt, 13:26
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, David Bell, 12:40
Re: [OM] Trip to California, Tim Hughes, 12:13
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Andrew Fildes, 11:53
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 11:40
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, JOHN DUGGAN, 11:38
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Jez Cunningham, 11:32
Re: [OM] OM4t Champagne Colour, Jez Cunningham, 11:22
[OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?, Dawid Loubser, 08:51
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Chris Barker, 07:23
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, Chris Barker, 07:19
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Chuck Norcutt, 05:07
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, C.H.Ling, 03:43
Re: [OM] Trip to California, Jeff Keller, 03:09
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Jim Couch, 01:09
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Jim Couch, 00:58
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, NSURIT, 00:41
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, NSURIT, 00:40
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, NSURIT, 00:37
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Chuck Norcutt, 00:36
Re: [OM] Photographing Police Officers - Clarification from No10, Ken Norton, 00:32
Re: [OM] OM4t Champagne Colour, Clay Nichols, 00:28
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Clay Nichols, 00:27
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, Chuck Norcutt, 00:25
Re: [OM] Trip to Californa, Richard Man, 00:15
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, Chuck Norcutt, 00:13
Re: [OM] WTB - Olympus Chrome Six, Andrew Fildes, 00:10
Re: [OM] White-balance / colour balance issues... What to do?, Andrew Fildes, 00:08