| Subject: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:45:14 -0500 |
> > Average enthusiasts don't buy $3000 cameras. > Oh REALLY? That might be a surprise to the manufacturers. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Andrew Fildes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film, Marc Lawrence |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |