Re: [OM] An old comparison of scanned film vs microphotograph of film

[Ken Norton]

>
> And $12 for a roll of processed film compared to $3,000 for a DSLR was
> not a bogus argument?  :-)
>

When you consider that the average enthusiest rarely shot more than 20 rolls
per year I do believe it is a bogus argument.

Working pros are another story and I acknowledge the superiority of digital
in "mass production" mode where it's all a numbers game.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/