Quite a dramatic difference.
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Film may have very high absolution resolution (for B/W lines) but the pixel
> quality of digial image is just better, see here a scan of RVP50 at 4000dpi
> with 4000ED and a 21MP 5D II capture, both taken with 24/2.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/ST-10004.jpg (6.8MB)
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_0918.JPG (5.5MB)
>
> C.H.Ling
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Hughes"
>
>
> A long time back C.H.Ling shared on list some of his comparisons of film
> scanner vs microphotographs of the film.
> This is is essentially the same, but is done at 2400dpi and 4000dpi, so
> gives an idea of what is lost at different scanner resolutions. Remember
> that film scanners have nominally a lot better resolution and lower
> artifacts than digi cameras, at same dpi, because they don't use Bayer
> sensor patterns, so resolution is same for all colors. (Bayer resolution is
> half for red and blue versus green).
>
> Contrast and AA filter also affect nominal resolution, so comparisons are
> always difficult.
>
> http://www.porteous.net/test/digi.html
>
>
> Tim Hughes
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
