Moose wrote:
> Russ Butler wrote:
>> Moose wrote:
>> ... Were you looking for something more postcard beautiful?
>> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=NorthEast_2009/MtDesert&image=_MG_7928ia.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>> Not, by the way, a marked or named scenic spot, but not hidden, either.
>>
>> Moose
>>
>> Beautiful shot.
>>
>
> Thanks!
>
>> (but there are a few blown pixels. Not to worry though, there's a guy
>> that hangs out on this list that will probably fix it up for you :-).
>>
>
> Are you sure? Looking at it on a non-color aware browser? I set it so
> the very thin high end of the histogram just kissed the top, so there
> should only be a very few pixels at 255 in any color, let alone a pure
> white. Here's a small set of histograms from three applications.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Misc&image=_MG_7928iahistg.jpg>
>
> FastStone seems to think it doesn't quite touch the end. IrfanView
> thinks there are no pixels in the top few slots. CS3, which is what I
> edited in, says it just kisses the top.
I made the comment about blown pixels in jest though raw therapee and
smart curve (a plugin) show a few clipped highlights. I surely couldn't
"see" that from a histogram and certainly not by eye.
It would take a helluva lot more clipping to degrade that image, which
is lovely and very rich, especially in aRGB.
--
Russ Butler (NJ USA)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
