I agree 100%, I am amazed that a photography-related magazine would
not publish that
beautiful and artistic (not to mention abstract) photograph. What in
the world is there
for kids to not see? Heck, every kid spends his first couple of months
in very close
proximity to two of those :-)
But Iwert, you are right, this is the same kind of people who would
shun classic art
as being "wrong" or "perverse"...
Very nicely done, Andrew. The pinhole look sure is different, and
cannot be replicated
(IMHO) by doctoring an image taken through a lens.
On 02 Oct 2009, at 12:55 PM, iwert bernakiewicz wrote:
> 2009/10/2 Andrew Fildes:
>>
>> My best pinhole so far (er, nudity warning) -
>> http://www.pbase.com/afildes/image/117690547
>> (5D2, Bowens Striplight, my mate Andy's f192 home made pinhole)
>> This is more fun than sharp. Shame the magazine won't use it.
>> ("We're a family magazine - the publisher's family and they don't
>> approve").
>> Andrew Fildes
>
> Poor kids if they aren't allowed to see this natural beauty... I
> suppose they never visit a museum with classic art either and the
> bathroom doors have locks in the house :)
>
> Iwert
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|