Oh man, I love Google-translated Engrish. From the page:
> "Increase the resolution further. Discouraging because the
> graininess of
> the film is not clear, the focus might be a sweet time to scan."
Anyway, almost all of these lenses (apart from the Mirror lens, which
looks worse than the others)
appear to be limited by film grain in the test - they should have used
Pan F :-) The 250/2.0 does
seem to have remarkable resolution and freedom from colour fringing
for a lens that
sucks in anywhere from double to eight times the light compared to the
others.
Thanks for the link Ed! Now where are the artistic shots?
D.
On 30 Oct 2009, at 3:02 PM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/ykrrfgq
>
> This shows some tests of the 250/2 vs. others. Navigate up to see
> tests of other Zuikos against 3rd party lenses. Overall a good site
> with useful info. no real 'art' shots from the lenses though, mostly
> test type shots, unfortunately.
>
> FWIW
> -Ed
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|