Re: [OM] 80/4.0 Macro resolving power?

[Chuck Norcutt]

The problem is that Gary's test of the 80/4 was done at 1:40 like all of 
the "normal" lenses even though the lens is designed to work at high 
magnification.  But he clearly recognized the shortcomings of the test 
conditions by saying so and labeling it "experimental".

Chuck Norcutt


Ken Norton wrote:
> Here is Gary Reese's lens test for the 80 F4 lens:
> 
> http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=97
> 
> In comparison, here is the 90 F2 lens:
> 
> http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=258&Itemid=97
> 
> And the 50 F2 macro:
> 
> http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=246&Itemid=97
> 
> And the star of the show the 135 F4.5 lens:
> 
> http://zone-10.com/cmsm/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=266&Itemid=97
> 
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/