I dunno but there's a relative test at the bottom of this page
which says the auto version of the 80/4 is slightly better than the
Apo-Rodagon D 75mm f/4 1:1 macro.
<http://photo.net/olympus-camera-forum/00H25k>
Chuck Norcutt
Dawid Loubser wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just for interests sake, does anybody know what the actual resolving
> power
> of the 80/4.0 Macro is at the various apertures? I am hoping it's good
> enough to be
> basically diffraction-limited, and by reputation it's possibly the
> finest 1:1
> lens that covers a full 35mm frame in the world (the Ultra Micro
> nikkors are amazing,
> there are models that are diffraction-limited at f/1.2 and even f/1.0,
> but almost none
> of these exotic models do 1:1 or cover a 35mm frame, and some of them
> only do specialised
> wavelengths of light (UV, etc).
>
> I know the 80/4.0 is bloody good, but I would like to satisfy my
> boyish curiosity with
> some technical information on just "how" good it is.
>
> Anybody?
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|