I can't argue with what you feel comfortable with and the methods you
prefer to use. But the specifics of what you are doing should be easily
done in the camera supplied software or any of several free applications.
Chuck Norcutt
Jim Couch wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> I am not sure that I completely agree with you here. First of, UV and
> grad ND filters, while not cheap, are not all that expensive either, and
> some folks may already have them from their film days. Secondly, the
> digital darkroom is anything but free, software costs, and computer
> hardware are not cheap either.
>
> In the end, cost may well be a wash depending on where you are starting
> from. In the end it probably is more a matter of personal preference -
> for me, I would rather to things in the field via filters than at the
> computer. It is not that one is any better than the other, but I really
> do not enjoy working at the computer myself.
>
> Jim Couch
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Sounds to me like you're spending a lot of money to do what can be done
>> quickly and free in the digital darkroom.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|