>
> In your reply, as well as in a post from Ken, both of you make reference to
> the lower pixel count of the E-1 and its impact on the images. Most of my
> images go to the web or to family members, and large prints don't enter my
> consideration. I suspect that 5MP would suffice for any work that I would
> attempt.
>
That is correct. The E-1 really only falls down when printing larger than
11x14. Of course, this is subject dependent, but for my bread-and-butter
paying work the E-1 is still quite sufficient but just lacks that edginess
when we seem to want these days.
Also note that the E-1's sensor has tremendous usable dynamic range.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|