But what do you do if the choice is between ISO 3200 wedding pictures or
no wedding pictures?
Chuck Norcutt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> Just did a quick calculation, with a flash of GN100 (ft), a white painted
> ceiling of height 40ft, object distance 20ft, at ISO3200 you get an aperture
> value of around F6.5 to work with, looks good. But dark ceiling is a totally
> different story. On the other hand I will avoid ISO3200 even with a 5D II,
> especially for a group of people.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"
>
>> The flash was pointed straight up. No doubt much of the light came from
>> reflection off the lighter stone below the wood. But regardless of
>> where it came from I was startled to see that there was any visible at
>> all. My mental computation of the sensitivity of the camera at ISO 3200
>> was way off.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> C.H.Ling wrote:
>>> The light in your 2nd image looks like came from the "leakage" of your
>>> flash
>>> directly and some reflection off the wall, may be only a very small
>>> amount
>>> is came from the ceiling. But for indoor I highly recommend to use flash
>>> bounce off any where possible, the additional light could be very useful.
>>> I
>>> did some with high ceiling too (not as high as your example) with
>>> Fujipress
>>> 800 ten years ago with the 100/2, 24/2 and 180/2.8, even with F2 wide
>>> open
>>> it wouldn't work without flash.
>>>
>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/f800/f800.htm
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|