Jez Cunningham wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Philippe Amard <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>wrote:
>
>
>
>>I've had an OM2 in the past, with a cool 28, a mighty 50 1.4 and a sharp>
>>
>>
>135, all long gone when the shutter electronics developed some
>
>
>>stubborness not to produce the higher speeds, gone ...
>>
>>
>...
>
>
>>Any insight on a (soon to be) available body that would reconcile
>>
>>
>their best(s), or even better?
>
>Yes - I have an OM-2n body I could sell you...
>
>
Thanks I passed mine on a long time ago ;-) .
ph
>br
>Jez in .be land
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|