[OM] Wyoming was - RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Mike Stoesz, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] Wyoming was - RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] Wyoming was - RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] Wyoming was - RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/31

Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Mike Stoesz, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/31

[OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Iwert, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Thomas Heide Clausen, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Lawrence Woods, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] 300/4.5 tripod collar fits 65-116 auto tube?, Lawrence Woods, 2009/03/31

Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Mike Stoesz, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Donald, 2009/03/31

[OM] Nathan's PAD 30/03/2009: Didier in Zurich, Nathan, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/03/2009: Didier in Zurich, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/03/2009: Didier in Zurich, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/03/2009: Didier in Zurich, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 30/03/2009: Didier in Zurich, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31

[OM] Hong Kong Flower Show 2009, Michael Wong, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] Hong Kong Flower Show 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] Hong Kong Flower Show 2009, Michael Wong, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] Hong Kong Flower Show 2009, Moose, 2009/03/31

[OM] First Experience of self-development to push up ISO, Michael Wong, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] First Experience of self-development to push up ISO, Iwert, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] First Experience of self-development to push up ISO, Michael Wong, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] First Experience of self-development to push up ISO, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] First Experience of self-development to push up ISO, Michael Wong, 2009/03/31

[OM] E-450, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] E-450, Donald, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] E-450, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] E-450, Moose, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] E-450, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] E-450, Donald, 2009/03/31

[OM] Point Lobos, etc., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31

• Re: [OM] Point Lobos, etc., Chris Barker, 2009/03/31
  • Re: [OM] Point Lobos, etc., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31

[OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30

• Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30

[OM] [OT] Seagate "Barracuda" HDs, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30

• Re: [OM] [OT] Seagate "Barracuda" HDs, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] [OT] Seagate "Barracuda" HDs, Moose, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Seagate "Barracuda" HDs, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] [OT] Seagate "Barracuda" HDs, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/31

[OM] Back Yards Anyone!, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/30

• Re: [OM] Back Yards Anyone!, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] Back Yards Anyone!, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Back Yards Anyone!, Iwert, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Back Yards Anyone!, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/30

[OM] [Photo] Annas father, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/29

• Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Moose, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Moose, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/30
    • [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Iwert, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, bwhitmire, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Chris Barker, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [Photos] Foggy Ardennes, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Michael Wong, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, Iwert, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Annas father, SwissPace, 2009/03/30

[OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Michael Wong, 2009/03/29

• Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Michael Wong, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Michael Wong, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Mike Stoesz, 2009/03/30
• [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Michael Wong, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] [WTB]Enlarger lens for 120 printing, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/31

[OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Christopher L. Tabby, 2009/03/29

• Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Moose, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
  • [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Moose, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], bwhitmire, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Ian Nichols, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Iwert, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] Edward Weston - NY Times feature, usher99, 2009/03/30

[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 12: meanderings around Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/29

• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 12: meanderings around Alicante, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/29
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 12: meanderings around Alicante, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 12: meanderings around Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/29

[OM] Nathan's PAD 28/03/2009: my wife went shopping in Andorra, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/29

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/03/2009: my wife went shopping in Andorra, Donald, 2009/03/29
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/03/2009: my wife went shopping in Andorra, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/03/2009: my wife went shopping in Andorra, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 28/03/2009: my wife went shopping in Andorra, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29

Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/28

• Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Moose, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
  • [OM] Red River Valley, David Bell, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, John Hudson, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Ken Norton, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Donald, 2009/03/29
    • [OM] dreaming in techni-colour, John Hudson, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Donald, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Red River Valley, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, SwissPace, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Chris Barker, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one!, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29

[OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28

• Re: [OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Moose, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] FireFly DSC1000 Digital Sensor Cleaner, Moose, 2009/03/28

[OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, usher99, 2009/03/28

• Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Moose, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Donald, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/28

[OM] Stumped--stop down metering manual +/- auto on OM, usher99, 2009/03/28

• Re: [OM] Stumped--stop down metering manual +/- auto on OM, Moose, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Stumped--stop down metering manual +/- auto on OM, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28

[OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/27

• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Moose, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Chris Barker, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Moose, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Michael Collins, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, John Hermanson, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] OT: Apple introduces the Macbook Wheel, AS, 2009/03/28

[OM] Chuck's back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27

• [OM] Earth Hour, James R, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chris Barker, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Moose, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, James R, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chris Barker, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Moose, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, SwissPace, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Iwert, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] RF and other radiation + odyssey was: Earth Hour, Moose, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/31
    • [OM] Strange CF Card behaviour, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Strange CF Card behaviour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Strange CF Card behaviour, Rand E, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Strange CF Card behaviour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Strange CF Card behaviour, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Earth Hour, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/31
• Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] Our back yard, Iwert, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] Our back yard, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] Our back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Our back yard, Iwert, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] Our back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
• Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Charles Geilfuss, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30
  • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, John Hermanson, 2009/03/31
• [OM] Chuck's back yard, usher99, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, John Hermanson, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Ken Norton, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, John Hermanson, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Ken Norton, 2009/03/31
    • Re: [OM] Chuck's back yard, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/30

[OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, usher99, 2009/03/27

• Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
  • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Ken Norton, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Ken Norton, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
  • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/28
• [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, usher99, 2009/03/27

[OM] Failed to mount the 25mm enlarger lens to adaptor for 39mm enlarger, Michael Wong, 2009/03/27

• Re: [OM] Failed to mount the 25mm enlarger lens to adaptor for 39mm enlarger, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/27
  • Re: [OM] Failed to mount the 25mm enlarger lens to adaptor for 39mm enlarger, Michael Wong, 2009/03/27

[OM] Data Rot, Jay Drew, 2009/03/27

• Re: [OM] Data Rot, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27

[OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/26

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Ken Norton, 2009/03/26
    • [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Back yards any one! was Re: Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009:morning view, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/27
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/26
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 25/03/2009: morning view, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/27

Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/26

• Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?(sample variation), Sue Pearce, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?(sample variation), Ken Norton, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
    • Re: [OM] Anyone tried a ZD 9-18 yet?, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/27

[OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], usher99, 2009/03/26

• Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/26
• Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/28
• [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], usher99, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27
  • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/28
• Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], usher99, 2009/03/27

[OM] Ida, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] Ida, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] Ida, Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Ida, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] Ida, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/26
• Re: [OM] Ida, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/26

[OM] Irma, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] Irma, Moose, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] Irma, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Irma, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Irma, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Irma, John Hermanson, 2009/03/26
• Re: [OM] Irma, Chris Barker, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] Irma, Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/26
• Re: [OM] Irma, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/26

[OM] A silly adapter?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Moose, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Ken Norton, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Moose, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] A silly adapter?, Ken Norton, 2009/03/26
    • [OM] Flooding, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Flooding, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Flooding, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Flooding, Ken Norton, 2009/03/26

[OM] [FS] Are you really sure you don't need a 75-150/4?, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] [FS] Are you really sure you don't need a 75-150/4?, Moose, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] [FS] Are you really sure you don't need a 75-150/4?, Iwert, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] [FS] Are you really sure you don't need a 75-150/4?, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/26

[OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Chris Barker, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Darin, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Darin, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/26
  • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, Oregon, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/27

[OM] Light at Home, usher99, 2009/03/25

• Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/25

[OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24

• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, John Hermanson, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Moose, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], SwissPace, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chris Barker, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
    • [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), SwissPace, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), Piers Hemy, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), SwissPace, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Last chance to vote for Luc :-), Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Ken Norton, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Foliage in web images [was Mud Season in Maine], Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Doug, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, John Hermanson, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Ken Norton, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] (OT) Mud Season in Maine, Donald, 2009/03/25

[OM] Nathan's PAD 23/03/2009: Taco in the morning, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/24

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 23/03/2009: Taco in the morning, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24

[OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24

• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Chris Barker, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] venice beach drum circle, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24

[OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/23

• Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, SwissPace, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, SwissPace, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Donald, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Donald, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Doug, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Moose, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Ken Norton, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chris Barker, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, SwissPace, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, bwhitmire, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, James R, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, usher99, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/25
  • Re: [OM] EPSON Stylus Photo R1900 on sale, Chris Barker, 2009/03/25

[OM] Anniversary, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23

• Re: [OM] Anniversary, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Ken Norton, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Ken Norton, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] Anniversary, Ken Norton, 2009/03/25

[OM] back to basics, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23

• Re: [OM] back to basics, Michael Wong, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Martyn Smoothy, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Chris Barker, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, Iwert, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/25
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/25
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Doug, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, John Hermanson, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/23
  • [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, SwissPace, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, Chris Barker, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] I think this is one of my best shots of Cai so far, John Hermanson, 2009/03/24
  • Re: [OM] back to basics, bwhitmire, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] back to basics, Moose, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] back to basics, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24

[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/22

• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
• Message not available
  • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Chris Barker, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Ian Nichols, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Chris Barker, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Moose, 2009/03/28
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Chris Barker, 2009/03/30
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Light at Home, Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/26
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Moose, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] [Leica] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach -- addendum, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 11: dogs and beach, Nicoletta Da Ros, 2009/03/24

[OM] IMG: good deeds, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/21

• Re: [OM] IMG: good deeds, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] IMG: good deeds, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] IMG: good deeds, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/21

[OM] Black OM-4T fraud, John Hermanson, 2009/03/20

• Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, John Hermanson, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Steve & Alicia Goss, 2009/03/22
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, John Hermanson, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, John Hermanson, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Iwert, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, John Hermanson, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Black OM-4T fraud, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22

[OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/20

• Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chris Barker, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] ACR was: Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] ACR was: Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/22
• Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Moose, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/23
• Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Mark Marr-Lyon, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Ken Norton, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/24
• Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] Swamp walk at the Big Cypress Gallery, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/24

[OM] Is Kentmere the old Ilford film?, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/20

• Re: [OM] Is Kentmere the old Ilford film?, David Bell, 2009/03/20
• Re: [OM] Is Kentmere the old Ilford film?, photo, 2009/03/20

[OM] Spring Vienna Equinox, Ken Norton, 2009/03/20

• Re: [OM] Spring Vienna Equinox, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] Spring Vienna Equinox, Ken Norton, 2009/03/20

[OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, tOM Trottier, 2009/03/19

• Re: [OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, Chris Barker, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, khen lim, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, Chris Barker, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] Apical dynamic range interview: Digital Photography Review, khen lim, 2009/03/21

[OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, usher99, 2009/03/19

• [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, usher99, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Moose, 2009/03/22

[OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19

• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/19
  • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Ken Norton, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/20
• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Chris Barker, 2009/03/22
• Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/20
  • Re: [OM] New Home Page pic: Oly 510, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/21

Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/19

• Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, usher99, 2009/03/20

Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/19

• Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19

[OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/19

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Chris Barker, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
  • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Donald, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/21
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 18/03/2009: eye contact, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/19

[OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., usher99, 2009/03/18

• Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton, 2009/03/18
  • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Michael Collins, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Doug, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Donald, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Doug, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chris Barker, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18
• Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18

[OM] E3+35-70/3.6, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/17

• Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Moose, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Moose, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/18
  • Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Ken Norton, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Chris Barker, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/17

[OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17

• Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Mark Dapoz, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Moose, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] Anybody need memory? It's getting very cheap., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18

[OM] Supersharp, usher99, 2009/03/17

• Re: [OM] Supersharp, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17

[OM] Sounds in the sky [was Re: Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website], Jan Steinman, 2009/03/17

• Re: [OM] Sounds in the sky [was Re: Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website], Chris Barker, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] Sounds in the sky [was Re: Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website], Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] Sounds in the sky [was Re: Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website], Willie Wonka, 2009/03/23

[OM] Z. 35 shift question, usher99, 2009/03/17

• Re: [OM] Z. 35 shift question, Ken Norton, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] Z. 35 shift question, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] Z. 35 shift question, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] Z. 35 shift question, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/17

[OM] The ones that get away., Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/16

• Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Donald, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/18
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/19
• Message not available
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., ws, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Jim Nichols, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18
• Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/21
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Donald, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Sue Pearce, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Doug, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chris Crawford, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Jim Nichols, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Sue Pearce, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chris Crawford, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chris Crawford, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Sue Pearce, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/23
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Charles Geilfuss, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/24
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/22
    • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chris Crawford, 2009/03/22
• Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/22
• Re: [OM] The ones that get away., jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/03/22
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/22
  • Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/23

[OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Lawrence Woods, 2009/03/16

• Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Lawrence Woods, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Moose, 2009/03/18
• Re: [OM] DZ 70-300mm lens prices, Lawrence Woods, 2009/03/18
  • [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Moose, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/19
    • [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Iwert, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Iwert, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Frank Wijsmuller, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Frank Wijsmuller, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Iwert, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Frank Wijsmuller, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Jon Mitchell, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, John Hudson, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, John Hermanson, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Chris Barker, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ken Norton, 2009/03/21
    • Re: [OM] 35-80 for reasonable price, Ian Manners, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Moose, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/19
    • [OM] 5D2 resilience WAS Split image screen for 5DII, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 5D2 resilience WAS Split image screen for 5DII, Ken Norton, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] 5D2 resilience WAS Split image screen for 5DII, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/20
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/19
    • Re: [OM] Split image screen for 5DII, Iwert, 2009/03/19

[OM] A wasted effort, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16

• Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Ken Norton, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Ken Norton, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Moose, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] A wasted effort, Ken Norton, 2009/03/17

[OM] [OT] Request help for Rolleiflex TLR parts, Michael Wong, 2009/03/16

• Re: [OM] [OT] Request help for Rolleiflex TLR parts, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Request help for Rolleiflex TLR parts, Michael Wong, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] [OT] Request help for Rolleiflex TLR parts, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Request help for Rolleiflex TLR parts, Michael Wong, 2009/03/17

[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/16

• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Chris Barker, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Donald, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Moose, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Chris Barker, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/17
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Moose, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Chris Barker, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/18
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Moose, 2009/03/18
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
• Re: [OM] [Pad] IMG: Nathan's PAW 10: Villajoyosa and Alicante, Ron Box, 2009/03/26

[OM] Scanning/sampling, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/15

• Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, ws, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, Moose, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, Ian Manners, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Scanning/sampling, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/17

[OM] (OM) New photosite, Brian Swale, 2009/03/15

• Re: [OM] (OM) New photosite, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] (OM) New photosite, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15

[OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/15

• Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, ws, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, ws, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, ws, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, ws, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Moose, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Moose, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, Moose, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Vivitar 2x-teleconverter for Hasselblad: RESULTS, ws, 2009/03/16

[OM] Nathan's PAD 14/03/2009: winter, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/03/2009: winter, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 14/03/2009: winter, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14

Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, John Hudson, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chris Barker, 2009/03/15
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, John Hermanson, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Michael Collins, 2009/03/15
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Moose, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Moose, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/17

[OM] Digital Picture Frames, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/15
• Re: [OM] Digital Picture Frames, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/15

[OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Chris Barker, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, John Hermanson, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] [Photo] Ida and friends, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/16

[OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, John Hermanson, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, AS, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Michael Collins, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Donald, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Mark Marr-Lyon, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/15
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, John Hermanson, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Stephen Walker, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] [OT] Does someone understand PC graphics cards?, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14

[OM] New very fast charge lithium batteries on the horizon, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] New very fast charge lithium batteries on the horizon, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16

[OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Ralf Loi, 2009/03/16
• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Ken Norton, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] IMG: gallery from backup camera, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16

[OM] 35/2 in the dark, usher99, 2009/03/14

• [OM] Friday 13th, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Darin, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/14
    • [OM] OT : Photoshop & Bridge CS4, John Hudson, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] OT : Photoshop & Bridge CS4, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chris Barker, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, AS, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Donald, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/16
    • [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Sue Pearce, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough - or 6 even., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Michael Collins, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/18
    • Re: [OM] Friday 13th, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/18

[OM] Flower show portrait 2009, usher99, 2009/03/14

• Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/14

[OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/13

• Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Moose, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), John Hudson, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] 35/2 Zuiko, better subject (Was Re: 35/2 in the dark), Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14

[OM] Galleries Closing, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13

• Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Donald, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Moose, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Moose, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] Galleries Closing, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/14

Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, photo, 2009/03/13

• Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, photo, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Martyn Smoothy, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14
• Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Mike Stoesz, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, NSURIT, 2009/03/23
  • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/25

[OM] Cold-weather shooting and WWMRD, Michael Collins, 2009/03/13

• Re: [OM] Cold-weather shooting and WWMRD, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13

[OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, usher99, 2009/03/13

• Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Moose, 2009/03/13
• [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, usher99, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
• [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, usher99, 2009/03/14

[OM] 35/2 in the dark, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/12

• Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Moose, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Donald, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, John Hermanson, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/13
    • [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Moose, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Results from really cheap pinhole camera, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/14
    • [OM] 50/1.8 in the dark [was 35/2 in the dark], Moose, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] 50/1.8 in the dark [was 35/2 in the dark], Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/29
    • Re: [OM] 50/1.8 in the dark [was 35/2 in the dark], Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/29
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13
• [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] 35/2 in the dark, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13

[OM] E-620 samples, Donald, 2009/03/12

• Re: [OM] E-620 samples, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] E-620 samples, Donald, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] E-620 samples, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] E-620 samples, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] E-620 samples, Donald, 2009/03/13

[OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/12

• Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Chris Barker, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Chris Barker, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Donald, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16

[OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12

• Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
  • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Golden Child Kit first time outing, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/12

[OM] T Power Control 1 needs epoxy., Johan Malmström, 2009/03/12

• Re: [OM] T Power Control 1 needs epoxy., Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] T Power Control 1 needs epoxy., John Hermanson, 2009/03/12
  • Re: [OM] T Power Control 1 needs epoxy., Johan Malmström, 2009/03/13

[OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/11

• Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Michael Collins, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Moose, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Moose, 2009/03/12
    • [OM] Latest flash card rebates [was Camedia Card Reader], Moose, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Latest flash card rebates [was Camedia Card Reader], Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Latest flash card rebates [was Camedia Card Reader], Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Latest flash card rebates [was Camedia Card Reader], Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Latest flash card rebates [was Camedia Card Reader], Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Moose, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Michael Collins, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Michael Collins, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Camedia Card Reader, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12

[OM] And Then It Goes Boom!, Richard Man, 2009/03/11

• Re: [OM] And Then It Goes Boom!, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] And Then It Goes Boom!, Richard Man, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] And Then It Goes Boom!, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11

[OM] OT: anybody experienced with LX-3, usher99, 2009/03/11

• Re: [OM] OT: anybody experienced with LX-3, Moose, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] OT: anybody experienced with LX-3, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11

[OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 9: Charleroi to Alicante, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/10

• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 9: Charleroi to Alicante, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 9: Charleroi to Alicante, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 9: Charleroi to Alicante, Donald, 2009/03/11
• Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 9: Charleroi to Alicante, Moose, 2009/03/17

[OM] Black Pen FT bodies - real or ersatz, Martin Walters, 2009/03/10

• [OM] OT: anybody experienced with LX-3, Iwert, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] OT: anybody experienced with LX-3, Moose, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Black Pen FT bodies - real or ersatz, Mark Dapoz, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Black Pen FT bodies - real or ersatz, Walters, Martin, 2009/03/11

[OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10

• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Moose, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Donald, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Chris Barker, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/11
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Charles Geilfuss, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, John Hermanson, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, John Hermanson, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Charles Geilfuss, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, John Hermanson, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Charles Geilfuss, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/11
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Moose, 2009/03/12
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/14
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/16
  • Re: [OM] Sign of Spring, John Hermanson, 2009/03/16

[OM] IMG: a gruelling match of petanque, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/10

• Re: [OM] IMG: a gruelling match of petanque, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] IMG: a gruelling match of petanque, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] IMG: a gruelling match of petanque, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] IMG: a gruelling match of petanque, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/10

Re: [OM] don't say please !, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] don't say please !, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] don't say please !, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] don't say please !, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/10

[OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Iwert, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Donald, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, John Hermanson, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, khen lim, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Moose, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Highly overrated? Not, John Hermanson, 2009/03/12

[OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Brian Swale, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09

[OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, Brian Swale, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, Donald, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, Brian Swale, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] (OM) Website on the way I hope, Donald, 2009/03/09

[OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Brian Swale, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Donald, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] ( E-1, E-510) White balance lens cap, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09

[OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09

• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Donald, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Moose, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Mark Marr-Lyon, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Mark Marr-Lyon, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, John Hermanson, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Frank van Lindert, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Frank van Lindert, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Willie Wonka, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/12
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/13
• Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/13
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Chris Barker, 2009/03/15
  • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Moose, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Ken Norton, 2009/03/16
    • Re: [OM] Mammoth E-30 Product Review - Zone-10 Website, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/17

[OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, USHER99, 2009/03/08

• Re: [OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, John Hudson, 2009/03/10

[OM] Nathan's PAD 08/03/2009: Sunday señorita, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/08

• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 08/03/2009: Sunday señorita, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 08/03/2009: Sunday señorita, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/08

[OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08

• [OM] don't say please !, John Hudson, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, John Hudson, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Rand E, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, SwissPace, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] don't say please !, John Hudson, 2009/03/10
  • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Donald, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] don't say please !, Russ Butler, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Doug, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Frank van Lindert, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Frank van Lindert, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Doug, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] JPEG quality loss - some data, Frank van Lindert, 2009/03/09

[OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Brian Swale, 2009/03/08

• Re: [OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] ( E1 & E-510) Second week of autumn 2009, Chris Barker, 2009/03/08

[OM] IMG: Valencia, Nathan Wajsman, 2009/03/08

• Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Chris Barker, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] IMG: Valencia, Paul Laughlin, 2009/03/08

[OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, usher99, 2009/03/07

• Re: [OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, Sandy Harris, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] Print your next image on paper made from Wombat sh*t, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/08

[OM] 12 is enough,, usher99, 2009/03/07

• Re: [OM] 12 is enough,, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough,, Sandy Harris, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough,, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08

[OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Ken Norton, 2009/03/07

• Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Chris Crawford, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Moose, 2009/03/11
  • Re: [OM] Vert Lives to See Another Photo, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11

[OM] Visitor to our garden, Chris Barker, 2009/03/07

• Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Martyn Smoothy, 2009/03/07
• Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/07
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Moose, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Chris Barker, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/08
    • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, John Hermanson, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, John Hudson, 2009/03/10
    • [OM] Well OT Hawk, was Visitor to our garden, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] Well OT Hawk, was Visitor to our garden, SwissPace, 2009/03/10
• Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, jgettis81@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] Visitor to our garden, Jan Steinman, 2009/03/08

[OM] 12 is enough, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/06

• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Richard Lovison, 2009/03/07
    • [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ian Manners, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ken Norton, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ian Manners, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, AS, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ian Manners, 2009/03/07
    • [OM] summer storm on Maldonado bay (sRGB)², Fernando Gonzalez Gentile, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ken Norton, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ken Norton, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/07
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Frank Wijsmuller, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Wiliam Wagenaar, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Moose, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, John Hudson, 2009/03/07
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Moose, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/11
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/06
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/06
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/06
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/07
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, GMcGrath, 2009/03/07
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/07
  • Re: [OM] [SPAM] Re: 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/07
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, William Sommerwerck, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Dawid Loubser, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Wayne Harridge, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sandy Harris, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Jim Nichols, 2009/03/12
    • [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Michael Wong, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Iwert, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Michael Wong, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Walters, Martin, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Tom Fenwick, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Joel Wilcox, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Donald, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Iwert, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Ken Norton, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/14
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Timpe, Jim, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Michael Wong, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Jez Cunningham, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, John Hermanson, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, siddiq@xxxxxxx, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, C.H.Ling, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Sue Pearce, 2009/03/13
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Piers Hemy, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/12
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/12
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, ws, 2009/03/08
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chris Barker, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, bwhitmire, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Rand E, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Johan Malmström, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Marc Lawrence, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chris Barker, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, David Thatcher, 2009/03/11
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, ws, 2009/03/09
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, GMcGrath, 2009/03/08
• Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Mike Lazzari, 2009/03/09
  • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/09
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, ws, 2009/03/10
    • Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt, 2009/03/10