On Mar 25, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Moose wrote:
> <snip>
> Today I decided to try some different approaches to the problem.
> Anyone
> with sharp eyes is invited to peruse a bunch of alternatives and
> give me
> their opinions. Those who can't MF focus anymore may see little
> difference between some (most?) of them.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/tech/Foliage/DownTexture.htm>
>
> Any help appreciated.
Some pretty subtle distinctions there, Your Mooseness. My old eyes
couldn't quite make out some of them, but I seemed to be partial to 4
and 9, though I must add that fiddling with that level of subtlety
would drive me someplace out beyond the back of distraction. I've
actually come to the conclusion that complex foliage is the devil's
own to get just right, even in a large print, never mind reduced for
web viewing. And lord knows there's a whole damn lot of foliage here
in Occupied Canada. Maybe one needs a Hasselblad and some good black
and white film and wet darkroom prints to get foliage just right. I'm
thinking about using Vaseline on my lenses when taking leaf pictures
this year. <g>
--Bob Whitmire
www.bwp33.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|