Subject: | [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away. |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:16:38 -0400 |
Easy for Chuck to say as he has Dr. Focus at his beck and call. Must repeat the olde saw that the real defintion of COC is a "group of photogs standing in a circle discussing DOF". I remember calculating the DOF by varying focal length--no significant change BUT..... the distribution of the DOF changes as more of it is behind the focal point with a WA lens. (from about 70% behind at 10mm to 52% at 100mm) I quit after a few minutes as my head hurt---less trouble with Schrödinger's wave equation. Mike Just don't confuse Circle of Confusion with diffraction and the Airy disk. Both may be considered optical "spots" produced by a lens. But the Airy disk is a measure of the smallest spot a lens is capable of producing at a given focal ratio... where the limitation is imposed by diffraction. The CoC is more a measure of the human eye's ability to resolve detail See the illustration at top right of this page. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_confusion> -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] E3+35-70/3.6, siddiq@xxxxxxx |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |