ML Archiv: Re: [OM] The ones that get away.

Subject:	Re: [OM] The ones that get away.
From:	Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:29:42 -0300

I wouldn't call it distraction, neither confusion -- but I know about it.

Moose wrote:
> I know mine is distraction limited.
>   


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] The ones that get away., (continued) Message not available Re: [OM] The ones that get away., ws Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Tom Fenwick Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Jim Nichols Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile [OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <= Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Donald Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Candace Lemarr

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose
Previous by Thread:	[OM] CoC and DOF, was: The ones that get away., Chuck Norcutt
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] The ones that get away., Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]