Subject: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:03:59 +1100 |
I should have been a lot more er...y'know, loquacious. What I meant is that I handle a lot of compacts designed for sale to handbag holders and pocket wearers who will NEVER print them larger than A4. EVER. Some will never print at all. They assume that more megapickles equals better quality image. Foolish. What it provides is slower computer performance as they resize them to small sizes for emailing or websites. And the need for bigger cards, slower shooting and all that. For that market, anything over six is silly. Really smart enthusiasts and semi-pro's like us can extract the maximum performance from reasonable compacts of course which is why we like ones with RAW, even if we have to weasel it out ourselves. ;-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.pbase.com/afildes -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Bob Whitmire |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Sue Pearce |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |