Subject: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 7 Mar 2009 23:04:44 +1100 |
There are limits I suppose - I note that someone (where?) suggested that the magnificent 14-24mm f2.8 is a little soft in the corners on the D3x while the D3 doesn't show it. I do know that the bloody thing reveals even the smallest damn mistake I make in focussing. I wonder if that's what's delaying that monster Leica SLR. They can't get the lenses right? Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 07/03/2009, at 10:39 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > On the other hand, maybe the lenses aren't up to any more. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Donald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |