Subject: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:45:09 +1100 |
The 12-60mm lacks the build quality of the others. It's a lovely lens but not really robust enough for outdoor pro work. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 07/03/2009, at 2:33 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > It seems to me that the 12-60/2.8-4 should also be considered as > well as > the 14-35/2.0 and 35-100/2.0 pair which I think were meant as the real > competition for the full frame 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 pairs from > Canikon. > > Of course, for the price difference between the Oly and Canon glass > you > could get the full frame body instead. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Timpe, Jim |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |