Subject: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:33:58 -0500 |
It seems to me that the 12-60/2.8-4 should also be considered as well as the 14-35/2.0 and 35-100/2.0 pair which I think were meant as the real competition for the full frame 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 pairs from Canikon. Of course, for the price difference between the Oly and Canon glass you could get the full frame body instead. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >> And I still dont know why Olympus havent produced something like >> the 35-80mm F2.8 for the 4/3's system. Surely there must be a market >> for a lense like that. >> > > > Well, I'd say that the 14-54 is close. Bokeh is wrong, but sharpness is > there. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, AS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sigma Lens 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |