well, Moose - until now, 03:47 a.m., I've been struggling for a better
version.
No way, v.2 is horrible, and is travelling to the Trash right now.
hats off - how did you manage that sky? - not only details in the
clouds, but a more real blue. Think I didn't nail with the amount of
yellow, blue resulted even more 'electric', but yours is quite like the
Provia ... even in my monitor ! :-)
I'm taking notes on the magentas and purples (those in the R-C-B
triangle, the 'non spectral colors' as said my old Sears-Zemansky
physics book).
Someday I will be able to do what you did by myself. I will, when I
subscribed here I was very reluctant to learn PS, I preferred blow-ups
in Radiance paper. But here I am, after what Mike told me once: "not PS
!? what a blasphemy !." _ ;^)
Thanks a lot Moose and CH :-)
Fernando.
Moose wrote:
> Fernando, I like the image.
>
> C.H.Ling wrote:
>
>> Usually I will not check histogram unless I found something strange. For
>> your image the shadow is ok as you may intended to kill unnecessary details.
>> But the highlight (sky) could use a more smooth transaction, I believe there
>> should be more details on the slide but I could be wrong.
>>
>>
>
> C.H., I agree. There's actually quite a bit of recoverable highlight and
> shadow detail even in the JPEG.
>
> Fernando, I don't quite believe the magentas and purples. Maybe you have
> different colors in the antipodes than I've seen up here?
>
> Here's what I consider a modest improvement in color highlight and
> shadow tonalities.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/FGonzalezG/bahiadeM.htm>
>
> It's fine with the foreground all black, but I think I sort of prefer it
> with a little detail that picks up the sky colors.
>
> Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|