Subject: | Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:07:47 -0400 |
They were but you specifically mentioned the amount of detail that would be visible in a largish print. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >> Hmmm. I thought you were going to show us some of the detail. >> > > > I guess I misunderstood. I thought Moose's trees were downsized. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Point Lobos [was Edward Weston - NY Times feature], Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Downsized trees and sharpening redux, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Play video games, improve your eyesight for greys!, tOM Trottier |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |