Why do I have to blame the camera? Why can't I blame the lens
performance at f/2.8?
Chuck Noructt
C.H.Ling wrote:
> To add more fun to the discussion, here is a shot with 50/1.4 at F2.8 on
> E-3.
>
> E-3 RAW converted with Oly RAW, sharpness -2, NR: off
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/50mmF28.jpg
>
> The 90/2 at F22 shot still look better. Ok, you can blame the strong AA
> filter on E-3 :-)
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose"
>
>>> But why have a 21MP camera if your happy with 4?
>> I'm not quite convinced that the theoretical charts agree with practical
>> experience. The subjects are complex, the lenses are complex and the
>> releation of lens to sensor still a bit murky. I've done tests where
>> more MPs in the same size actually resolve less than fewer.
>>
>> While the theory is generally correct, I'm not sure it plays out that
>> simply in practice. C.H.'s f22 image lookslmore like 6+ MP to me than 4.
>> ........
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
