To add more fun to the discussion, here is a shot with 50/1.4 at F2.8 on
E-3.
E-3 RAW converted with Oly RAW, sharpness -2, NR: off
http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/50mmF28.jpg
The 90/2 at F22 shot still look better. Ok, you can blame the strong AA
filter on E-3 :-)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose"
>> But why have a 21MP camera if your happy with 4?
>
> I'm not quite convinced that the theoretical charts agree with practical
> experience. The subjects are complex, the lenses are complex and the
> releation of lens to sensor still a bit murky. I've done tests where
> more MPs in the same size actually resolve less than fewer.
>
> While the theory is generally correct, I'm not sure it plays out that
> simply in practice. C.H.'s f22 image lookslmore like 6+ MP to me than 4.
> ........
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
