I'm very surprised that there is such a version dependency for a
plug-in. I would have thought that any prior API would be present and
compatible even if there were later "improvements". If this is true I
see Adobe as the real culprit.
Chuck Norcutt
Sue Pearce wrote:
>> Read the user reviews of the HP Pro B9180 on B&H's web site. Some folks
>> are really happy. Others are totally disgusted with HP for poor quality
>> control. One guy is on his fifth printer in 6 months.
> Wow. This is a collection of some of the saddest stories I've ever heard.
> Again, mine has been flawless.
> I must say that I print B&W in a proper darkroom, so kno't know about that
> part, but the color prints are perfect. I use the Ilford and Harman fiber
> papers and Kodak gloss paper.
>
> There is one thing that is just totally wrong, though. The printer shipped
> with a photoshop plug-in for printing that worked quite well, and I think
> was part of the secret to good color. It is for CS2 only, and ther eis no
> plan to develpp one for CS3 or 4. I emailed HP support about this when I
> upgraded to 4, but was told that they had no plans for 3 or 4 support. What
> the hell are they thinking. What a screwed up company.
>
> Still like the printer, though.
>
> Bill Pearce
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|