Subject: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:45:40 +1100 |
Actually '10' would be appropriate as an allusion to that movie. Nice girl but an absolute airhead. That's why the 'lost and wistful' look works best for her. She wasn't an easy shoot. She has a number of 'flaws' which I had to work at overcoming - fat thighs for instance! And a rather odd nose (see #4) which is why #7 is a good shot. Great eyes and tummy though and I always like good high contrast eyes, a particular weakness of mine. I was surprised how well a shiny black paper backdrop worked with a suntan as well. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 13/03/2009, at 4:07 AM, Piers Hemy wrote: > Am I alone in finding the Subject line of this thread in need of > amendment? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Setting up photo storage on 2+ hard drives, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Flower show portrait 2009, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 12 is enough, ws |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |