| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM16mm was - 14mm rectilinear Sigma for OM |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:31:33 -0500 |
I think he has a habit of producing stunning water lilly pictures... as well as stunning photos of other things... not all inanimate. Chuck Norcutt Don Holbrook wrote: > I rarely comment, but #1181 is absolutely stunning. > > ----- Original Message ----- > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM16mm was - 14mm rectilinear Sigma for OM, Donald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 1/3/2009: the universal plight of men, Chuck Norcutt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM16mm was - 14mm rectilinear Sigma for OM, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM16mm was - 14mm rectilinear Sigma for OM, C.H.Ling |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |