My experience was that the A700 was better than that at 800,
certainly better than the 40D. But my target was more contrasty, with
brighter colours and black areas in dim conditions (that is, more
'real world' than laboratory condtions).
Confirms my views about Nikon but - very clean.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 16/01/2008, at 3:53 AM, Winsor Crosby wrote:
> There is a direct comparison between the E-3, D300, A700, 40D noise in
> the A700 review on dpreview.com. The difference between the E-3 and
> the others is not slight. Whether that is important or not is up to
> the photographer.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra700/page17.asp
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|