Thanks Chris, that is very helpful. I have downloaded them and will
open them in Lightroom to have a closer look.
Cheers,
Nathan
On 15-jan-2008, at 15:43, Chris Barker wrote:
>
> Hi Nathan
>
> Well I don't have the smaller bodies, but here are 3 photos from the
> E-3 for you to see.
>
> They are at ISO1600-400, handheld, ISO Off (Sorry!) and 14-54. You
> can see the decreasing shutter speed in the vibration. I'll go up and
> take another 3 with IS on now ...
>
> <http://www.threeshoes.net/page8/page8.htm>
>
> Chris
>
> On 15 Jan 2008, at 07:15, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I really like the specs and the feel of the E3 (played with it a bit
>> at a local Media Markt the other day). I am therefore thinking of
>> selling my Canon outfit, getting an E3 and keeping the E410 as a
>> backup body. What is holding me back from making a full commitment to
>> the 4/3 system is image quality at high ISO. I do not shoot the E410
>> above ISO 800, as I find the images virtually unusable; my Canon
>> 1DII, with its larger sensor and fewer megapixels, produces eminently
>> usable images at ISO 1600.
>>
>> I would therefore like to hear from people who have experience with
>> both the E410/510 and the E3: does the E3 deliver significantly
>> better high ISO performance than the other bodies? This is the single
>> most important deciding factor for me, as I hate flash and I like
>> low-
>> light environments.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
Nathan Wajsman
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|