Thanks for the link. But the comparison is using the respective
cameras' JPEG mode, which is irrelevant for me since I only shoot
RAW. I read somewhere else that the E3 exhibits significantly less
noise when shooting RAW.
Cheers,
Nathan
On 15-jan-2008, at 17:53, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> There is a direct comparison between the E-3, D300, A700, 40D noise in
> the A700 review on dpreview.com. The difference between the E-3 and
> the others is not slight. Whether that is important or not is up to
> the photographer.
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonydslra700/page17.asp
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On / January 15, 2008 CE, at 5:46 AM, James Howe wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, the latest Popular Photography has a review
>> with test
>> results for the E-3 and they say that E3 produces relatively low
>> noise
>> images all the way up to ISO 3200 as long as you are using RAW
>> capture.
>> Overall the review was very positive on just about all aspects of the
>> camera.
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
Nathan Wajsman
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|