I would suggest that you've made your participant audience unnecessarily
restrictive. You don't really need folks who have experience with both
cameras to tell you how they compare. All you need is some E3 images
shot at 1600 and higher under low light conditions. Then you can
compare with 1DII images which I think is your real goal.
Chuck Norcutt
Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I really like the specs and the feel of the E3 (played with it a bit
> at a local Media Markt the other day). I am therefore thinking of
> selling my Canon outfit, getting an E3 and keeping the E410 as a
> backup body. What is holding me back from making a full commitment to
> the 4/3 system is image quality at high ISO. I do not shoot the E410
> above ISO 800, as I find the images virtually unusable; my Canon
> 1DII, with its larger sensor and fewer megapixels, produces eminently
> usable images at ISO 1600.
>
> I would therefore like to hear from people who have experience with
> both the E410/510 and the E3: does the E3 deliver significantly
> better high ISO performance than the other bodies? This is the single
> most important deciding factor for me, as I hate flash and I like low-
> light environments.
>
> TIA,
> Nathan
>
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> General photography:
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|