Thanks for the reference. I read the review. The only problem is that
Pop Photo is just about the least trustworthy source of information I
can think of. When I lived in the US, I subscribed to it for a few
years, and I do not recall ever seeing a negative review of a new
camera or lens. Obviously, a magazine which costs almost nothing to
subscribe to and is totally dependent on advertising is never going
to bite the hand that feeds them.
I would consider opinions from folks here a much more reliable source
of info.
Cheers,
Nathan
On 15-jan-2008, at 14:46, James Howe wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, the latest Popular Photography has a review
> with test
> results for the E-3 and they say that E3 produces relatively low noise
> images all the way up to ISO 3200 as long as you are using RAW
> capture.
> Overall the review was very positive on just about all aspects of the
> camera.
>
>
> --
> James Howe
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
Nathan Wajsman
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|