Hi Nathan
Well I don't have the smaller bodies, but here are 3 photos from the
E-3 for you to see.
They are at ISO1600-400, handheld, ISO Off (Sorry!) and 14-54. You
can see the decreasing shutter speed in the vibration. I'll go up and
take another 3 with IS on now ...
<http://www.threeshoes.net/page8/page8.htm>
Chris
On 15 Jan 2008, at 07:15, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I really like the specs and the feel of the E3 (played with it a bit
> at a local Media Markt the other day). I am therefore thinking of
> selling my Canon outfit, getting an E3 and keeping the E410 as a
> backup body. What is holding me back from making a full commitment to
> the 4/3 system is image quality at high ISO. I do not shoot the E410
> above ISO 800, as I find the images virtually unusable; my Canon
> 1DII, with its larger sensor and fewer megapixels, produces eminently
> usable images at ISO 1600.
>
> I would therefore like to hear from people who have experience with
> both the E410/510 and the E3: does the E3 deliver significantly
> better high ISO performance than the other bodies? This is the single
> most important deciding factor for me, as I hate flash and I like low-
> light environments.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|