The Feb Pop Photo has an interesting review of the E3
in which they compare to other Olympus DSLR's.
--- Ton Maas <tonmaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Nathan,
>
> >I would therefore like to hear from people who have
> experience with
> >both the E410/510 and the E3: does the E3 deliver
> significantly
> >better high ISO performance than the other bodies?
> This is the single
> >most important deciding factor for me, as I hate
> flash and I like low-
> >light environments.
>
> Not exactly, but I can comment on the difference in
> high ISO
> performance between the E-1, 400 and 3. As I do a
> lot of concert
> photography this is quite important to me. I found
> the 400 to be
> completely useless for this purpose. Even at ISO 400
> noise is
> markedly present. So up to the end of November I've
> always used the
> E-1 for this work, even though I knew its powers in
> that department
> were meagre. I have now shot at least a dozen
> concerts with the E-3
> and I'm really impressed with the cleanliness of the
> images at ISO
> 1600, even as they are mainly jpegs.
>
> Ton
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|