ML Archiv: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor

Subject:	Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
From:	"Garry D. Lewis" <garrylewis747@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:47:20 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

>As far as they're concerned, the original Zuiko User Group is small and 
>old. So I was told.

>cheers
>:Doro

Well, I may be old- but I'm not small!

yours proposing a sit-in on Their laps,

Garry D. Lewis


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, (continued) Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, John Hermanson Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Dorothée Rapp Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Christoph Berndt [OM] Old and Small - marketing again, sigh, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Earl Dunbar Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Christoph Berndt Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Earl Dunbar Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, B. D. Colen Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Christoph Berndt Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Moose Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Garry D. Lewis <= Re: [OM] Attitude was: E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Dorothée Rapp Re: [OM] Attitude was: E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Attitude was: E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Dorothée Rapp Re: [OM] Attitude was: E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, James N. McBride Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Skip Williams Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Moose Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Lama-Jim L'Hommedieu Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Richard F. Man Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Jim Brokaw

Previous by Date:	[OM] A last hurrah?, Donald MacDonald
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] A last hurrah?, Jeff Keller
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Moose
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Attitude was: E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor, Dorothée Rapp
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]