The 24mm f2 was (is) brilliant, was (is) it not? Who makes a 24mm f1.2? 14
f2.8?
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 12/2/2003 at 10:56 AM Christoph Berndt wrote:
>Am 01.12.2003 16:04 Uhr schrieb "Dorothée Rapp" unter <om@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> As far as they're concerned, the original Zuiko User Group is small and
>> old. So I was told.
>>
>> cheers
>> :Doro
>
>
>yeah,
>
>some talk with someone at OLYMPUS EUROPE in Hamburg/Germany makes me
>totally
>hopeless in believing that OLYMPUS maybe KNOW something about the real
>qualities of their own OM-system.
>
>On the other hand they (in Hamburg) really believe (seems to me like
>Immanuel Kants wish to the power of god), that the 4/3-system would be
>professionel - harharhar - in the eighties, when i became a pro i choosed
>OM, because of its light weight and quality - but this decision was not
>honoured by OLYMPUS in developing some more professionel lenses (like
>14/2.8
>or 24/1.2 and so on).
>
>So, i have NOTHING motive to believe OLYMPUS in their utopian view of the
>4/3 system.
>
>with regards, Christoph
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|