No one makes a 24 1.2 - Canon makes an excellent 24 1.4.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Earl Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:42 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
The 24mm f2 was (is) brilliant, was (is) it not? Who makes a 24mm f1.2?
14 f2.8?
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 12/2/2003 at 10:56 AM Christoph Berndt wrote:
>Am 01.12.2003 16:04 Uhr schrieb "Dorothée Rapp" unter
><om@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> As far as they're concerned, the original Zuiko User Group is small
>> and old. So I was told.
>>
>> cheers
>> :Doro
>
>
>yeah,
>
>some talk with someone at OLYMPUS EUROPE in Hamburg/Germany makes me
>totally hopeless in believing that OLYMPUS maybe KNOW something about
>the real qualities of their own OM-system.
>
>On the other hand they (in Hamburg) really believe (seems to me like
>Immanuel Kants wish to the power of god), that the 4/3-system would be
>professionel - harharhar - in the eighties, when i became a pro i
>choosed OM, because of its light weight and quality - but this decision
>was not honoured by OLYMPUS in developing some more professionel lenses
>(like 14/2.8 or 24/1.2 and so on).
>
>So, i have NOTHING motive to believe OLYMPUS in their utopian view of
>the 4/3 system.
>
>with regards, Christoph
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|