Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor

Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
From: Skip Williams <om2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:25:28 -0500
There's a new, 35/1.2 from Cosina/Voigtlander, introduced this year.  That's 
the only f/1.2 lens south of a 50mm that I've ever heard of.  

There is also an 85/1.2 Zeiss lens that was produced for the Contax SLR mount 
(limited production).

I haven't heard of any other maker with an f/1.2 lens outside of the "normal" 
~50-60mm range.

Skip

>
>Subject: Re: [OM] E-1 4/3 vs. full sensor
>   From: Christoph Berndt <christob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:25:44 +0100
>     To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>I never said that there IS any 1.2/24, but i wish that i.e. olympus would
>build some lenses like it. I know the 1.4/24 CANON, and i know the 2/24
>ZUIKO - the difference is not sharpness or vignetting, but more light on the
>screen when you work in available light situations - 1.2 would be better to
>focuse, not to shoot.
>
>And there was NO 1,4/85, 1,8/135 and the 2/180 etc. they came too late.
>We know: that´s only my personal opinion. :-))
>
>It´s all over now, baby ZUIKO.
>
>with regards, Christoph
>
>
>Am 04.12.2003 20:21 Uhr schrieb "B. D. Colen" unter <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> No one makes a 24 1.2 - Canon makes an excellent 24 1.4.
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz