Exactly, the poor Notilux images were posted here before, the M*nolta 55/1.2
images I have seen were having the same problem.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> As do most super-fast 50s...I get trashed on the Leica list for saying
> it, but the bokeh of the much vaunted Notilux is appallingly bad - in
> fact at times some of the images I've seen make me feel queasy....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C.H.Ling
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > In <3FCFE9F0.1050601@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 12/04/03
> > at 06:14 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> >
> > >I can see an advantage in going from f2 to f1.2, a full stop, in the
> > >wide and tele ranges, but I never could see the photographic point of
>
> > >the f1.2 50mm lenses. For bragging rights, sure, but otherwise, 1/3
> > >stop over f1.4 ain't much to get excited about.
> >
> > But if the character of the lens is quite different?
> >
> > -
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Unfortunately the Zuiko 50/1.2 has poorer bokeh than the 1.4.
>
> C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|